YGMZ vs ZTO

For growth investors, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -54. 6% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) delivered a total return of -12. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZTO returned +74. 6% versus YGMZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

76β versus ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. 's 0. 36β — meaning ZTO is approximately -148% more volatile than YGMZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 28% for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -54. 6% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 9% for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YGMZ leads at 32. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 9% net margin versus -15. 3% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTO leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 0% for YGMZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTO leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, ZTO (3.

9% yield) pays a dividend. YGMZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

76)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YGMZ: -100. 0%, ZTO: +74. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: YGMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZTO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ZTO pays a dividend while YGMZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.