YGMZ vs ZTO vs GXO vs XPO

For growth investors, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -54. 6% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is the cheapest at 16. 1x versus GXO Logistics, Inc. at 185. 3x. On forward P/E, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus YGMZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

76β versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning XPO is approximately -328% more volatile than YGMZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 3% for GXO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -54. 6% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -75. 0% for GXO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YGMZ leads at 32. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.

(ZTO) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 9% net margin versus -15. 3% for MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTO leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 0% for YGMZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTO leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 42. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GXO: 40. 2% to $72. 71.

In this comparison, ZTO (3.

9% yield) pays a dividend. YGMZ, GXO, XPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited (YGMZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

76)). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YGMZ: -100. 0%, XPO: +21. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: YGMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZTO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GXO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ZTO pays a dividend while YGMZ, GXO, XPO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.