Travel Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YTRA vs TCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
YTRA vs TCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $64M | $34.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.37B | $59.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-129M | $31.17B |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $784M | $40.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $606M | $48.44B |
YTRA vs TCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 200.9 | +100.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YTRA vs TCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YTRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.94
- Rev growth 89.9%, EPS growth -193.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 58.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 9.9%, current ratio 2.09x
TCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 24.0% 10Y total return vs YTRA's -89.7%
- 52.2% margin vs YTRA's -1.2%
- 11.5% ROA vs YTRA's -1.0%, ROIC 8.1% vs -0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.9% revenue growth vs TCOM's 19.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs YTRA's -1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs TCOM's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.5% vs TCOM's -14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs YTRA's -1.0%, ROIC 8.1% vs -0.9% |
YTRA vs TCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YTRA vs TCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 5.8x YTRA's $10.4B. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YTRA's -1.2%. On growth, TCOM holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.4B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $438M | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$129M | $31.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.2% | +188.1% |
Valuation Metrics
YTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TCOM's 15.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than YTRA's 28.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $64M | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -100.74x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.56x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM delivers a 18.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for YTRA. YTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCOM's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs YTRA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $178M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $606M | $48.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $784M | $40.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 31.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCOM five years ago would be worth $13,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,074 for YTRA. Over the past 12 months, YTRA leads with a +58.5% total return vs TCOM's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCOM at 17.4% vs YTRA's -20.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.5% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.5% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | +61.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.0% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YTRA and TCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCOM's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCOM currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs YTRA's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $78.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $48.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.9% |
TCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). YTRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YTRA vs TCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YTRA or TCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yatra Online, Inc.
(YTRA) is the stronger pick with 89. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 7% for Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YTRA or TCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) delivered a total return of +36. 8%, compared to -49. 3% for Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCOM returned +24. 0% versus YTRA's -89. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YTRA or TCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yatra Online, Inc.
(YTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 97β — meaning TCOM is approximately 4% more volatile than YTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 28% for Trip. com Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YTRA or TCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yatra Online, Inc.
(YTRA) is pulling ahead at 89. 9% versus 19. 7% for Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trip. com Group Limited grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -193. 9% for Yatra Online, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YTRA leads at 58. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YTRA or TCOM?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus -1. 3% for Yatra Online, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCOM leads at 26. 6% versus -1. 1% for YTRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCOM leads at 81. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YTRA or TCOM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YTRA or TCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCOM: +24. 0%, YTRA: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YTRA and TCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.