Travel Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $64M | $34.87B | $132.72B | $4.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.37B | $59.76B | $27.69B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-129M | $31.17B | $6.15B | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 80.7% | 100.0% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 26.0% | 34.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.9x | 16.3x | 69.3x |
| Total Debt | $784M | $40.32B | $19.29B | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $606M | $48.44B | $17.20B | $509M |
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 198.3 | +98.3% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 253.1 | +153.1% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 308.8 | +208.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YTRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 89.9%, EPS growth -193.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 58.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 9.9%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.09x
- 89.9% revenue growth vs BKNG's 13.4%
TCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.97
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 69.3x)
- 52.2% margin vs YTRA's -1.2%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
- PEG 0.10 vs TCOM's 0.11
- Beta 0.74 vs MMYT's 1.17
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MMYT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.9% revenue growth vs BKNG's 13.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 69.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs YTRA's -1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs MMYT's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.5% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs YTRA's -1.0% |
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKNG leads 1 • YTRA leads 1 • MMYT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 57.5x MMYT's $1.0B. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YTRA's -1.2%. On growth, BKNG holds the edge at +16.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.4B | $59.8B | $27.7B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $438M | $16.4B | $10.2B | $175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$129M | $31.2B | $6.2B | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | $0 | $9.0B | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.2% | +80.7% | +100.0% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +26.0% | +34.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +52.2% | +22.2% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +35.7% | +32.6% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +15.5% | +16.2% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.2% | +188.1% | +2.4% | -68.3% |
Valuation Metrics
YTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, TCOM trades at a 76% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BKNG offers better value at 0.16x vs TCOM's 0.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $64M | $34.9B | $132.7B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $33.7B | $134.8B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -100.74x | 14.66x | 25.87x | 60.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.89x | 16.32x | 69.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.56x | 15.25x | 13.41x | 28.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 4.45x | 4.93x | 4.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.74x | — | 4.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.47x | 14.61x | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM delivers a 18.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for YTRA. YTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TCOM's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs YTRA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | +18.3% | — | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +11.5% | +21.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +8.1% | — | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.1% | +9.0% | +75.4% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.28x | — | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $178M | -$8.1B | $2.1B | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $606M | $48.4B | $17.2B | $509M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $784M | $40.3B | $19.3B | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 31.34x | 7.21x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,074 for YTRA. Over the past 12 months, YTRA leads with a +58.5% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 25.5% vs YTRA's -20.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.5% | -28.4% | -19.4% | -38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.5% | -14.1% | -16.8% | -54.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | +61.9% | +65.4% | +97.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +36.8% | +87.6% | +97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | +24.0% | +250.7% | +190.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.0% | +17.4% | +18.3% | +25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TCOM and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MMYT's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TCOM currently trades 67.6% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.01x | 0.73x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $78.99 | $5129.83 | $113.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $48.48 | $150.62 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +67.6% | +3.3% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 57.1 | 42.4 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 2.7M | 8.7M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
TCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TCOM as "Buy", BKNG as "Buy", MMYT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 35.3% for BKNG (target: $232). BKNG is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.00 | $231.72 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 71 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.9% | +4.9% | +0.5% |
TCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BKNG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
YTRA vs TCOM vs BKNG vs MMYT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yatra Online, Inc.
(YTRA) is the stronger pick with 89. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 4% for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
On trailing P/E, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Trip. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Booking Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -49. 3% for Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +240. 1% versus YTRA's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus MakeMyTrip Limited's 1. 21β — meaning MMYT is approximately 67% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 28% for Trip. com Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yatra Online, Inc.
(YTRA) is pulling ahead at 89. 9% versus 13. 4% for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trip. com Group Limited grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -193. 9% for Yatra Online, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YTRA leads at 58. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus -1. 3% for Yatra Online, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus -1. 1% for YTRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 69. 3x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 67. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. YTRA, TCOM, MMYT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YTRA or TCOM or BKNG or MMYT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 9% yield, +240. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +240. 1%, MMYT: +174. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YTRA and TCOM and BKNG and MMYT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YTRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TCOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock. BKNG pays a dividend while YTRA, TCOM, MMYT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.