Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Security & Protection Services
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $28M | $4.10B | $19.73B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $169M | $127M | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-14M | $-289M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 56.0% | 42.4% | 25.8% | 15.1% |
| Operating Margin | 49.7% | -13.8% | -68.3% | -27.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $778K | $4M | $24M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55K | $248M | $87M | $22M |
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AiRWA Inc. (YYAI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YYAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 41.5% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- 8.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 25.1% vs -41.6%
SOUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 96.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- 28.4% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- 99.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
BBAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.31
- +36.7% vs YYAI's -98.2%
GFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.31, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.31, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 2.31 vs SOUN's 3.58
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.5% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.31 vs SOUN's 3.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs YYAI's -98.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 25.1% vs -41.6% |
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YYAI leads in 3 of 6 categories
SOUN leads 1 • BBAI leads 1 • GFAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YYAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $169M annually — 7.9x YYAI's $21M. YYAI is the more profitable business, keeping 41.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, YYAI holds the edge at +113.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $169M | $127M | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $52M | -$75M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$14M | -$289M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$77M | -$56M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +42.4% | +25.8% | +15.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +49.7% | -13.8% | -68.3% | -27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | -8.3% | -2.3% | -32.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -45.5% | -44.3% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.1% | +59.4% | -0.9% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.5% | +113.9% | +52.0% | +38.9% |
Valuation Metrics
YYAI leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, YYAI's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOUN's 355.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $4.1B | $19.7B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $3.9B | $19.7B | -$9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.05x | -278.32x | -5.09x | -0.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.96x | 355.51x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.15x | 24.30x | 154.51x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 8.42x | 24.45x | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
YYAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YYAI delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. SOUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFAI's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YYAI scores 6/9 vs BBAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | -3.5% | -50.7% | -69.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | -2.2% | -35.3% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.1% | -16.8% | -19.5% | -41.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +36.5% | -4.2% | -19.6% | -19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54,744 | -$244M | -$63M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54,744 | $248M | $87M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $777,894 | $4M | $24M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -12.84x | -18.17x | -167.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOUN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOUN five years ago would be worth $12,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for YYAI. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +36.7% total return vs YYAI's -98.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOUN at 52.4% vs YYAI's -95.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | -9.2% | -28.6% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.2% | +5.0% | +36.7% | -53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +254.0% | +49.5% | -93.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +28.4% | -56.9% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +28.4% | -57.6% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.4% | +52.4% | +14.3% | -60.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BBAI and GFAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GFAI is the less volatile stock with a 2.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOUN's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBAI currently trades 44.4% from its 52-week high vs YYAI's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.04x | 3.58x | 3.31x | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $264.50 | $22.17 | $9.39 | $1.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $5.83 | $2.96 | $0.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +43.4% | +44.4% | +31.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 64.6 | 63.3 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 474K | 27.9M | 34.6M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOUN as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 38.4% for SOUN (target: $13).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.33 | $6.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
YYAI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SOUN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
YYAI vs SOUN vs BBAI vs GFAI: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). AiRWA Inc. (YYAI) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI?
Over the past 5 years, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) delivered a total return of +28. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for AiRWA Inc. (YYAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOUN returned +28. 4% versus YYAI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guardforce AI Co.
, Limited (GFAI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 31β versus SoundHound AI, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning SOUN is approximately 55% more volatile than GFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AiRWA Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to 35. 4% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOUN leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI?
AiRWA Inc.
(YYAI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YYAI leads at 51. 3% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YYAI leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YYAI or SOUN or BBAI or GFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. AiRWA Inc. (YYAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOUN: +28. 4%, YYAI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YYAI and SOUN and BBAI and GFAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (YYAI (Consumer Cyclical) and SOUN (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YYAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.