Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $884M | $198M | $6.90B | $896.00B | $1.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $45M | $0.00 | $280.33B | $428M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-425M | $-79M | $-506M | $57.05B | $-58M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 91.2% | — | 60.0% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.1% | -196.7% | — | 25.9% | -8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $80M | $25M | $72K | $942.38B | $212M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $231M | $902M | $343.34B | $68M |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenas BioPharma, In… (ZBIO) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
| Arcturus Therapeuti… (ARCT) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 117.9 | +17.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 152.1 | +52.1% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4%
ARCT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.09x
- Beta 1.66, current ratio 9.09x
- +110.9% vs ARCT's -44.9%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
- Beta 0.94 vs ARCT's 2.46
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs ARCT's 2.46 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.9% vs ARCT's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs ZBIO's -97.4%, ROIC 4.5% vs -154.5% |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARCT leads 1 • ZBIO leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • ARDX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBIO's -37.8%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $45M | $0 | $280.3B | $428M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$423M | -$86M | -$532M | $81.4B | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$425M | -$79M | -$506M | $57.0B | -$58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$210M | -$59M | -$407M | $100.9B | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +91.2% | — | +60.0% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.1% | -196.7% | — | +25.9% | -8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.8% | -173.5% | — | +20.4% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -129.9% | — | +36.0% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -97.9% | — | — | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.5% | -82.7% | -14.1% | +16.0% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $884M | $198M | $6.9B | $896.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $853M | -$8M | $6.0B | $1.50T | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | -2.90x | -12.14x | 16.00x | -21.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 18.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 88.39x | 2.95x | — | 3.20x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 0.89x | 7.19x | 2.47x | 8.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.88x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-168 for ZBIO. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs ARCT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -167.7% | -36.6% | -68.2% | +15.9% | -38.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -28.4% | -62.2% | +1.3% | -11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -154.5% | -2.8% | — | +4.5% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.7% | -29.2% | -68.3% | +8.9% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.12x | 0.00x | 2.60x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$206M | -$902M | $599.0B | $144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $231M | $902M | $343.3B | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $25M | $72,000 | $942.4B | $212M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -62.50x | — | — | 0.74x | -0.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IMVT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,941 for ARCT. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs ARCT's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ARCT's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.6% | +11.5% | +29.8% | -0.5% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.9% | -44.9% | +110.9% | +21.8% | +53.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -74.6% | +55.0% | +138.2% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -80.6% | +213.0% | +118.2% | +207.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -79.4% | +237.9% | +465.8% | +162.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | -36.6% | +15.7% | +33.6% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCT's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ARCT's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.46x | 1.66x | 0.94x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.60 | $24.17 | $36.27 | $337.25 | $8.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $5.85 | $14.32 | $262.71 | $3.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +28.8% | +92.7% | +95.1% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 39.8 | 57.9 | 59.1 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 522K | 398K | 1.9M | 7.0M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZBIO as "Buy", ARCT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.8% upside for ARCT (target: $23) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $22.50 | $43.67 | $339.75 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 23 | 61 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 15 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.95 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZBIO vs ARCT vs IMVT vs JPM vs ARDX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -80. 6% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ARCT's -79. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. 's 2. 46β — meaning ARCT is approximately 161% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. grew EPS 20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -124. 5% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -37. 8% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 1% for ZBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCT: 222.
8% to $22. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ZBIO, ARCT, IMVT, ARDX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ZBIO or ARCT or IMVT or JPM or ARDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ARCT: -79. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZBIO and ARCT and IMVT and JPM and ARDX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBIO (Healthcare) and ARCT (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and ARDX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. JPM pays a dividend while ZBIO, ARCT, IMVT, ARDX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.