Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Rental & Leasing Services
Travel Services
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Rental & Leasing Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $49K | $5.59B | $156.29B | $1.89B | $84.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.51B | $6.52B | $53.69B | $8.70B | $12.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.32B | $2.86B | $8.54B | $-637M | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 43.2% | 41.0% | 13.6% | 82.9% |
| Operating Margin | 73.5% | -2.5% | 11.7% | 2.3% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.2x | 23.1x | — | 28.5x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $1.28B | $13.47B | $19.20B | $2.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.13B | $7.74B | $1.17B | $6.56B |
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoomcar Holdings, I… (ZCAR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 37.3 | -62.7% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 201.7 | +101.7% |
| Hertz Global Holdin… (HTZ) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 91.9 | -8.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZCAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 371.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
- 299.0% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%
LYFT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UBER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.14
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 81.5% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
Among these 5 stocks, HTZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +11.9% vs ZCAR's -97.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs ZCAR's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.1x vs 28.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 371.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs ABNB's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.9% vs ZCAR's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 299.0% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8% |
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZCAR leads in 1 of 6 categories
ABNB leads 1 • UBER leads 1 • LYFT leads 0 • HTZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZCAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 21.4x ZCAR's $2.5B. ZCAR is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTZ's -7.3%. On growth, ZCAR holds the edge at +83.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $6.5B | $53.7B | $8.7B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | -$63M | $7.0B | $2.4B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.3B | $2.9B | $8.5B | -$637M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $1.2B | $9.8B | -$4.9B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +43.2% | +41.0% | +13.6% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | -2.5% | +11.7% | +2.3% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +43.8% | +15.9% | -7.3% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +17.7% | +18.3% | -55.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.7% | +13.8% | +14.5% | +10.5% | +17.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.1% | — | -84.3% | +26.4% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LYFT and HTZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 94% valuation discount to ABNB's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HTZ's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49,428 | $5.6B | $156.3B | $1.9B | $84.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $5.7B | $162.0B | $19.9B | $80.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 2.11x | 15.95x | -2.51x | 35.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.20x | 23.13x | — | 28.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.67x | 8.46x | 31.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.88x | 3.00x | 0.22x | 6.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.83x | 5.69x | — | 10.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.01x | 16.01x | — | 18.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $31 for ABNB. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs HTZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +150.2% | +32.0% | — | +31.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +39.1% | +14.2% | -2.8% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -6.1% | +13.6% | +0.4% | +50.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -6.2% | +12.5% | +0.5% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.39x | 0.48x | — | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $145M | $5.7B | $18.0B | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.1B | $7.7B | $1.2B | $6.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $1.3B | $13.5B | $19.2B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 77.36x | -5.32x | 11.51x | 0.28x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,477 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ZCAR. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +11.9% total return vs ZCAR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 24.8% vs ZCAR's -98.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.3% | -27.4% | -8.9% | +15.9% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | +10.5% | -8.3% | -3.0% | +11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +68.2% | +94.3% | -62.9% | +12.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -70.8% | +64.8% | -77.6% | -3.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -81.6% | +81.5% | -77.6% | -2.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.3% | +18.9% | +24.8% | -28.1% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZCAR and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZCAR is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs ZCAR's 2.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.31x | 1.14x | 1.31x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.30 | $25.54 | $101.99 | $8.44 | $147.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $12.46 | $68.46 | $3.77 | $110.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.3% | +56.3% | +74.0% | +71.7% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 50.9 | 54.9 | 52.4 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 15.4M | 15.8M | 11.0M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", HTZ as "Hold", ABNB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.9% upside for UBER (target: $103) vs -11.9% for HTZ (target: $5).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.43 | $103.30 | $5.33 | $152.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 61 | 21 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.9% | +4.2% | 0.0% | +4.5% |
ZCAR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ABNB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +81. 5% versus ZCAR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
(ZCAR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning ABNB is approximately -5983% more volatile than ZCAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -8. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 9% for Airbnb, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UBER leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -281. 4% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABNB leads at 20. 8% versus -114. 2% for ZCAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABNB leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) trades at 23. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 5x for Airbnb, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBER: 36. 9% to $103. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
(ZCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZCAR: -100. 0%, LYFT: -81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZCAR and LYFT and UBER and HTZ and ABNB?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZCAR (Industrials) and LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and HTZ (Industrials) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZCAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HTZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.