Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$49K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.59B
5Y Perf.-62.7%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$156.29B
5Y Perf.+101.7%
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.-68.6%
ABNB
Airbnb, Inc.

Travel Services

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$84.82B
5Y Perf.-8.1%

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZCAR logoZCAR
LYFT logoLYFT
UBER logoUBER
HTZ logoHTZ
ABNB logoABNB
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationRental & Leasing ServicesTravel Services
Market Cap$49K$5.59B$156.29B$1.89B$84.82B
Revenue (TTM)$2.51B$6.52B$53.69B$8.70B$12.65B
Net Income (TTM)$9.32B$2.86B$8.54B$-637M$2.52B
Gross Margin50.4%43.2%41.0%13.6%82.9%
Operating Margin73.5%-2.5%11.7%2.3%20.5%
Forward P/E24.2x23.1x28.5x
Total Debt$14M$1.28B$13.47B$19.20B$2.07B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$1.13B$7.74B$1.17B$6.56B

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZCAR
LYFT
UBER
HTZ
ABNB
StockJan 22May 26Return
Zoomcar Holdings, I… (ZCAR)1000.0-100.0%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10037.3-62.7%
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)100201.7+101.7%
Hertz Global Holdin… (HTZ)10031.4-68.6%
Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB)10091.9-8.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UBER leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ABNB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

ZCAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 371.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
  • 299.0% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Technology Pick

LYFT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

UBER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.14
  • Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
  • 81.5% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -2.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, HTZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
ABNB
Airbnb, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ABNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +11.9% vs ZCAR's -97.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUBER logoUBER18.3% revenue growth vs ZCAR's -8.0%
ValueUBER logoUBERLower P/E (23.1x vs 28.5x)
Quality / MarginsZCAR logoZCAR371.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
Stability / SafetyUBER logoUBERBeta 1.14 vs ABNB's 1.31
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ABNB logoABNB+11.9% vs ZCAR's -97.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ZCAR logoZCAR299.0% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZCARZoomcar Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
HTZHertz Global Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
U.S. Car Rental
83.1%$8.6B
International Car Rental
16.9%$1.7B
ABNBAirbnb, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$12.2B

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLZCARLAGGINGHTZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ZCAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $53.7B annually — 21.4x ZCAR's $2.5B. ZCAR is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTZ's -7.3%. On growth, ZCAR holds the edge at +83.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$6.5B$53.7B$8.7B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.8B-$63M$7.0B$2.4B$2.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9.3B$2.9B$8.5B-$637M$2.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$82M$1.2B$9.8B-$4.9B$4.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.4%+43.2%+41.0%+13.6%+82.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+73.5%-2.5%+11.7%+2.3%+20.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.7%+43.8%+15.9%-7.3%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+17.7%+18.3%-55.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+83.7%+13.8%+14.5%+10.5%+17.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.1%-84.3%+26.4%+4.0%
ZCAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LYFT and HTZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 94% valuation discount to ABNB's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HTZ's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.6x.

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$49,428$5.6B$156.3B$1.9B$84.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13M$5.7B$162.0B$19.9B$80.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x2.11x15.95x-2.51x35.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.20x23.13x28.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.67x8.46x31.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x0.88x3.00x0.22x6.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.83x5.69x10.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.01x16.01x18.26x
Evenly matched — LYFT and HTZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $31 for ABNB. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs HTZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+150.2%+32.0%+31.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.0%+39.1%+14.2%-2.8%+10.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.1%+13.6%+0.4%+50.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.2%+12.5%+0.5%+26.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944746
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.39x0.48x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$145M$5.7B$18.0B-$4.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$1.1B$7.7B$1.2B$6.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$1.3B$13.5B$19.2B$2.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense77.36x-5.32x11.51x0.28x
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $16,477 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ZCAR. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +11.9% total return vs ZCAR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 24.8% vs ZCAR's -98.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.3%-27.4%-8.9%+15.9%+6.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.2%+10.5%-8.3%-3.0%+11.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+68.2%+94.3%-62.9%+12.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-70.8%+64.8%-77.6%-3.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-81.6%+81.5%-77.6%-2.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-98.3%+18.9%+24.8%-28.1%+4.0%
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ZCAR and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ZCAR is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs ZCAR's 2.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.02x1.31x1.14x1.31x1.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.30$25.54$101.99$8.44$147.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.06$12.46$68.46$3.77$110.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.3%+56.3%+74.0%+71.7%+96.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.250.954.952.457.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded23K15.4M15.8M11.0M3.5M
Evenly matched — ZCAR and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", HTZ as "Hold", ABNB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.9% upside for UBER (target: $103) vs -11.9% for HTZ (target: $5).

MetricZCAR logoZCARZoomcar Holdings,…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…HTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…ABNB logoABNBAirbnb, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.43$103.30$5.33$152.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts59612145
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.9%+4.2%0.0%+4.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ZCAR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ABNB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallZoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZCAR vs LYFT vs UBER vs HTZ vs ABNB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (24. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +81. 5% versus ZCAR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.

(ZCAR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning ABNB is approximately -5983% more volatile than ZCAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -8. 0% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. (ZCAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 9% for Airbnb, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UBER leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -281. 4% for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABNB leads at 20. 8% versus -114. 2% for ZCAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABNB leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) trades at 23. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 5x for Airbnb, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBER: 36. 9% to $103. 30.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ZCAR or LYFT or UBER or HTZ or ABNB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.

(ZCAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZCAR: -100. 0%, LYFT: -81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZCAR and LYFT and UBER and HTZ and ABNB?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZCAR (Industrials) and LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and HTZ (Industrials) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZCAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HTZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZCAR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $2B
  • Revenue Growth > 4185%
  • Net Margin > 223%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYFT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBER

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HTZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABNB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZCAR and LYFT and UBER and HTZ and ABNB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZCAR: 8371.1% · LYFT: 13.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ZCAR: 371.8% · LYFT: 43.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.