Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $7M | $27.20B | $5.17B | $29.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $3.20B | $638M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $909M | $239M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 75.5% | 89.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -24.0% | 28.7% | 37.4% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.9x | 16.6x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $26K | $96M | $12M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $1.42B | $210M | $1.98B |
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZCMD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 11.11x
VEEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.77
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs IQV's 167.5%
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 4.89x
- Beta 0.77 vs IQV's 1.33, lower leverage
DOCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- PEG 0.21 vs VEEV's 1.04
- 20.0% revenue growth vs ZCMD's -28.3%
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.21 vs 1.04
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +20.7% vs ZCMD's -78.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs ZCMD's -28.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.21 vs 1.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs ZCMD's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs IQV's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs ZCMD's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs ZCMD's -27.7%, ROIC 20.0% vs -30.1% |
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZCMD leads 1 • VEEV leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 610.6x ZCMD's $27M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZCMD's -25.5%. On growth, VEEV holds the edge at +16.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $3.2B | $638M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $956M | $250M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $909M | $239M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $1.4B | $314M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +75.5% | +89.7% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.0% | +28.7% | +37.4% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | +28.4% | +37.5% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | +43.7% | +49.2% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.2% | +16.0% | +9.8% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.3% | +23.9% | -16.2% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ZCMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.5x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 27% valuation discount to VEEV's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.29x vs VEEV's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $27.2B | $5.2B | $29.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$925,224 | $25.9B | $5.0B | $44.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.20x | 30.75x | 23.14x | 22.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.88x | 16.61x | 13.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 0.29x | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.23x | 20.85x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 8.51x | 9.06x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 3.87x | 4.77x | 4.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.32x | 19.22x | 19.38x | 14.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-30 for ZCMD. ZCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs ZCMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.5% | +13.4% | +24.4% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.7% | +11.1% | +20.7% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +12.9% | +20.0% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.3% | +13.8% | +22.3% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$1.3B | -$197M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $1.4B | $210M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26,083 | $96M | $12M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VEEV and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IQV five years ago would be worth $7,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for ZCMD. Over the past 12 months, IQV leads with a +20.7% total return vs ZCMD's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VEEV at -2.0% vs ZCMD's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.5% | -23.8% | -40.7% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.7% | -28.1% | -55.0% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -5.8% | -25.2% | -7.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -35.2% | -51.5% | -23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +519.6% | -51.5% | +167.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.5% | -2.0% | -9.2% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEEV and IQV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQV's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IQV currently trades 71.4% from its 52-week high vs ZCMD's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.77x | 1.03x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.18 | $310.50 | $76.51 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $148.05 | $20.55 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +53.9% | +33.6% | +71.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 53.8 | 60.9 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 2.2M | 2.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VEEV as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.4% upside for VEEV (target: $280) vs 27.9% for IQV (target: $226).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $280.10 | $42.79 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 42 | 22 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +2.3% | +4.2% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZCMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ZCMD vs VEEV vs DOCS vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 3% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus Veeva Systems Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) delivered a total return of -23. 7%, compared to -98. 4% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +519. 6% versus ZCMD's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning IQV is approximately 72% more volatile than VEEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -28. 3% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 7% for Zhongchao Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -55. 5% for Zhongchao Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -54. 4% for ZCMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Veeva Systems Inc. 's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Veeva Systems Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VEEV: 67. 4% to $280. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZCMD or VEEV or DOCS or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), +519. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEV: +519. 6%, ZCMD: -99. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZCMD and VEEV and DOCS and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZCMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.