Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Broadcasting
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Broadcasting | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.64B | $98M | $880M | $2.92T | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $2.32B | $3.86B | $742.78B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $-140M | $-473M | $90.80B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 51.0% | 78.5% | 50.6% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | -3.0% | -0.5% | 11.5% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 5.2x | — | 31.4x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $892M | $0.00 | $5.79B | $152.99B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $607M | — | $271K | $86.81B | $30.71B |
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 31.1 | -68.9% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 559.0 | +459.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.2x vs 31.4x)
- Beta 0.86 vs IHRT's 1.82
IHRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +415.5% vs AMCX's +29.1%
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs AMCX's +29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.4% |
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories
AMCX leads 1 • ZD leads 0 • IHRT leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 511.8x ZD's $1.5B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHRT's -12.2%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.3B | $3.9B | $742.8B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $420M | $686M | $339M | $155.9B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | -$140M | -$473M | $90.8B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $267M | $11M | -$2.5B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +51.0% | +78.5% | +50.6% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -3.0% | -0.5% | +11.5% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -6.0% | -12.2% | +12.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +11.5% | +0.3% | -0.3% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | -6.3% | +0.8% | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.3% | -10.4% | -20.8% | +74.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.8x trailing earnings, GOOGL trades at a 3% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $98M | $880M | $2.92T | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $98M | $6.7B | $2.98T | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.66x | — | -1.86x | 37.82x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.68x | 5.19x | — | 31.41x | 28.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.35x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.45x | 0.08x | 19.65x | 20.47x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 0.04x | 0.23x | 4.07x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | — | — | 7.14x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 0.32x | 80.64x | 378.98x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZD's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | -12.2% | — | +23.3% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | -3.3% | -12.0% | +11.5% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +12.1% | -0.4% | +14.7% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | — | -0.5% | +15.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | — | — | 0.37x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $285M | $0 | $5.8B | $66.2B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $607M | — | $270,900 | $86.8B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $892M | $0 | $5.8B | $153.0B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 0.95x | -0.17x | 39.96x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,813 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs AMCX's +29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs AMCX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | -7.5% | +36.6% | +19.7% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | +29.1% | +415.5% | +43.7% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.9% | -44.0% | +85.9% | +156.2% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.2% | -81.9% | -75.0% | +64.8% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.7% | -87.4% | -68.5% | +697.8% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | -17.6% | +23.0% | +36.8% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMCX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMCX is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AMCX's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.94x | 1.77x | 1.50x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.55 | $10.18 | $6.56 | $278.56 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.45 | $5.41 | $1.08 | $185.01 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +84.1% | +86.4% | +97.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 57.3 | 68.6 | 81.1 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 386K | 986K | 45.5M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZD as "Buy", AMCX as "Hold", IHRT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, GOOGL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.21% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.67 | $8.50 | $3.50 | $306.77 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 40 | 10 | 94 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZD vs AMCX vs IHRT vs AMZN vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the cheapest at 36. 8x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -81. 9% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus AMCX's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning IHRT is approximately 88% more volatile than AMCX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 51% for Ziff Davis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMC Networks Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -0. 5% for IHRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 26. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 13. 1% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ZD, AMCX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZD or AMCX or IHRT or AMZN or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), +1004% 10Y return). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +1004%, IHRT: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZD and AMCX and IHRT and AMZN and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZD (Communication Services) and AMCX (Communication Services) and IHRT (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.