Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Broadcasting
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $1.64B | $15.27B | $3.21B | $880M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $9.03B | $2.25B | $3.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $1.69B | $41M | $-473M |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 34.9% | 64.6% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 7.8% | 1.5% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.1x | 25.8x | 109.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $892M | $2.94B | $1.43B | $5.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $607M | $2.40B | $960M | $271K |
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -19.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- Better valuation composite
NWSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.2%
- 136.5% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.84x
- 18.7% margin vs IHRT's -12.2%
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
IHRT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +415.5% vs NWSA's -3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IHRT's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 6.8% vs -0.4% |
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZD leads 1 • IHRT leads 1 • IAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 6.2x ZD's $1.5B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHRT's -12.2%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $9.0B | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $420M | $469M | $129M | $339M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $1.7B | $41M | -$473M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $572M | $60M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +34.9% | +64.6% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +7.8% | +1.5% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +18.7% | +1.8% | -12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +6.3% | +2.7% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | +8.9% | -25.9% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.3% | +6.1% | +64.8% | -20.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ZD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, NWSA trades at a 65% valuation discount to ZD's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZD's 4.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IHRT's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $15.3B | $3.2B | $880M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $15.8B | $3.7B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.66x | 13.06x | -32.42x | -1.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.10x | 25.75x | 109.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.45x | 11.17x | 14.30x | 19.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 1.81x | 1.34x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.64x | 0.70x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 21.00x | 71.54x | 80.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ZD and NWSA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. IAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZD's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWSA scores 7/9 vs IHRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.6% | +18.1% | +0.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +10.9% | +0.6% | -12.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +6.8% | -1.2% | -0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +7.2% | -1.3% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.31x | 0.30x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $285M | $537M | $466M | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $607M | $2.4B | $960M | $270,900 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $892M | $2.9B | $1.4B | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 127.43x | 4.84x | -0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IHRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NWSA five years ago would be worth $10,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,504 for IHRT. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 23.0% vs ZD's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +3.6% | +10.5% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | -3.3% | +22.1% | +415.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.9% | +61.3% | -2.9% | +85.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.2% | +2.2% | -67.3% | -75.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.7% | +136.5% | +347.8% | -68.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | +17.3% | -1.0% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NWSA and IAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs NWSA's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.60x | 1.10x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.55 | $31.61 | $45.78 | $6.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.45 | $22.20 | $29.56 | $1.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +85.5% | +94.2% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 58.3 | 48.1 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 4.1M | 1.1M | 986K |
Analyst Outlook
NWSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZD as "Buy", NWSA as "Buy", IAC as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $32.40 | $49.17 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 28 | 33 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.6% | +1.0% | +9.8% | 0.0% |
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ZD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ZD vs NWSA vs IAC vs IHRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ziff Davis, Inc.
(ZD) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). News Corporation (NWSA) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (25. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
On trailing P/E, News Corporation (NWSA) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Ziff Davis, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Ziff Davis, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
Over the past 5 years, News Corporation (NWSA) delivered a total return of +2.
2%, compared to -75. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus IHRT's -68. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), News Corporation (NWSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 204% more volatile than NWSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 51% for Ziff Davis, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ziff Davis, Inc.
(ZD) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZD leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZD leads at 14. 1% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ziff Davis, Inc.
(ZD) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 102. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT?
In this comparison, NWSA (1.
2% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ZD, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZD or NWSA or IAC or IHRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZD and NWSA and IAC and IHRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZD (Communication Services) and NWSA (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and IHRT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NWSA pays a dividend while ZD, IAC, IHRT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.