ZEUS vs SXC vs RS vs HCC

For growth investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Olympic Steel, Inc.

(ZEUS) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. at 81. 3x. On forward P/E, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Olympic Steel, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

(HCC) delivered a total return of +469. 2%, compared to +19. 8% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCC returned +1202% versus SXC's +68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

(HCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Olympic Steel, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ZEUS is approximately 160% more volatile than HCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SXC leads at -2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RS leads at 7. 2% versus 2. 5% for ZEUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Olympic Steel, Inc. — 9. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCC: 28. 2% to $112. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

(HCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +1202% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCC: +1202%, ZEUS: +138. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ZEUS (Basic Materials) and SXC (Energy) and RS (Basic Materials) and HCC (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZEUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ZEUS, SXC, RS pay a dividend while HCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.