ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$3.32B
5Y Perf.+24.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZGN vs HBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.-61.3%
ZGN vs HBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZGN | HBI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3.32B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.88B | $3.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $196M | $330M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 32.0x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $219M | $215M |
ZGN vs HBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZGN
HBI
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ermenegildo Zegna N… (ZGN) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZGN vs HBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZGN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Hanesbrands Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
The Income Pick
ZGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth -37.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs HBI's -62.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
The Value Play
HBI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 32.0x)
- 9.6% margin vs ZGN's 5.1%
- 7.7% ROA vs ZGN's 7.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs 7.4%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZGN | 2.2% revenue growth vs HBI's -3.6% |
| Value | HBI | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 32.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | HBI | 9.6% margin vs ZGN's 5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | ZGN | Beta 1.38 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ZGN | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZGN | +65.6% vs HBI's +32.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HBI | 7.7% ROA vs ZGN's 7.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs 7.4% |
ZGN vs HBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
ZGN vs HBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZGNLAGGINGHBI
HBIHanesbrands Inc.
1leads
ZGNErmenegildo Zegna N.V.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HBIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HBI4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ZGN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ZGN3/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZGN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ZGN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZGN and HBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZGN and HBI operate at a comparable scale, with $3.9B and $3.4B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.6% (HBI) to 5.1% (ZGN).
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $474M | $496M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $196M | $330M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $379M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +42.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.7% | +8.0% |
Evenly matched — ZGN and HBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ZGN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBI's 16.6x.
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.03x | -7.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.00x | 9.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.03x | 16.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.87x | 66.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.38x | 10.11x |
HBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $21 for ZGN. ZGN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZGN scores 5/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.6% | +73.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 75.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $816M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $219M | $215M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.74x | 2.15x |
ZGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZGN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZGN five years ago would be worth $12,686 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,362 for HBI. Over the past 12 months, ZGN leads with a +65.6% total return vs HBI's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBI at 14.2% vs ZGN's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.6% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.4% | +49.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.9% | -62.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.8% | +14.2% |
ZGN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZGN is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZGN currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HBI's 91.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.38 | $7.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.61 | $3.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 703K | 104.2M |
ZGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ZGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZGN as "Buy" and HBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.1% upside for HBI (target: $7) vs -1.7% for ZGN (target: $13). ZGN is the only dividend payer here at 1.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ZGNErmenegildo Zegna… | HBIHanesbrands Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.83 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ZGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
ZGN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallErmenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZGN vs HBI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZGN or HBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Ermenegildo Zegna N. V. (ZGN) offers the better valuation at 37. 0x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ermenegildo Zegna N. V. (ZGN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZGN or HBI?
On forward P/E, Hanesbrands Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZGN or HBI?
Over the past 5 years, Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) delivered a total return of +26. 9%, compared to -66. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZGN returned +26. 9% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZGN or HBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 25% more volatile than ZGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ermenegildo Zegna N. V. (ZGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZGN or HBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -3. 6% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ermenegildo Zegna N. V. grew EPS -37. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZGN leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZGN or HBI?
Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZGN leads at 8. 6% versus 5. 3% for HBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZGN leads at 66. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZGN or HBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hanesbrands Inc.
(HBI) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 32. 0x for Ermenegildo Zegna N. V. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBI: 12. 1% to $7. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZGN or HBI?
In this comparison, ZGN (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZGN or HBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ermenegildo Zegna N.
V. (ZGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZGN: +26. 9%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZGN and HBI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ZGN pays a dividend while HBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZGN: -3.4% · HBI: -4.8%)Net Margin>
%
(ZGN: 5.1% · HBI: 9.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.