ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$6.85B
5Y Perf.+6.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZK vs XPEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$5.42B
5Y Perf.+162.7%
ZK vs XPEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZK | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $6.85B | $5.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90.59B | $60.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.33B | $-4.28B |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $15.60B | $15.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.78B | $18.59B |
ZK vs XPEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZK
XPEV
| Stock | May 24 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | 100 | 262.7 | +162.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZK vs XPEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZK leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. XPeng Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZK
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited
The Income Pick
ZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth 46.9%, EPS growth 34.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 126.6%
- -5.4% 10Y total return vs XPEV's -26.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
The Niche Pick
XPEV is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -5.0% ROA vs ZK's -5.4%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZK | 46.9% revenue growth vs XPEV's 33.2% |
| Quality / Margins | ZK | -3.7% margin vs XPEV's -7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | ZK | Beta 0.47 vs XPEV's 1.39 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZK | +6.1% vs XPEV's -18.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XPEV | -5.0% ROA vs ZK's -5.4% |
ZK vs XPEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
ZK vs XPEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZKLAGGINGXPEV
XPEVXPeng Inc.
1leads
ZKZEEKR Intelligent Tec…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XPEVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ZK5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XPEV3/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ZK3/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZK is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.6B annually — 1.5x XPEV's $60.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.7% (ZK) to -7.1% (XPEV). On growth, XPEV holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90.6B | $60.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.7B | -$3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.3B | -$4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.8% | +63.2% |
ZK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZK and XPEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.7B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.98x | -17.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.61x | — |
Evenly matched — ZK and XPEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPEV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZK scores 5/9 vs XPEV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.8B | -$2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.8B | $18.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.6B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.40x | -10.29x |
XPEV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZK five years ago would be worth $9,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,826 for XPEV. Over the past 12 months, ZK leads with a +6.1% total return vs XPEV's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPEV at 13.8% vs ZK's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.1% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +47.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | -41.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | +13.8% |
ZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPEV's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZK currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs XPEV's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.71 | $28.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.58 | $15.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 6.4M |
ZK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZK as "Buy" and XPEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.0% upside for XPEV (target: $26) vs 24.4% for ZK (target: $33).
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.25 | $25.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). XPEV leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallZEEKR Intelligent Technolog… (ZK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZK vs XPEV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZK or XPEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger pick with 46.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 33. 2% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Analysts rate ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZK or XPEV?
Over the past 5 years, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) delivered a total return of -5.
4%, compared to -41. 7% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZK returned -5. 4% versus XPEV's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZK or XPEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus XPeng Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning XPEV is approximately 198% more volatile than ZK relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ZK or XPEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is pulling ahead at 46.
9% versus 33. 2% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XPeng Inc. grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to 34. 6% for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZK leads at 126. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZK or XPEV?
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the more profitable company, earning -8.
5% net margin versus -14. 2% for XPeng Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZK leads at -8. 5% versus -16. 3% for XPEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZK leads at 16. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZK or XPEV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XPEV: 64.
0% to $25. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZK or XPEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ZK or XPEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZK: -5. 4%, XPEV: -26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZK and XPEV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZK: 36.4% · XPEV: 125.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.