Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZNTL logo
ZNTL
AUPH logo
AUPH
PRAX logo
PRAX
FOLD logo
FOLD
IQV logo
IQV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$267M
5Y Perf.-90.5%
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+0.9%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-18.9%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.+17.8%

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZNTL logoZNTL
AUPH logoAUPH
PRAX logoPRAX
FOLD logoFOLD
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$267M$2.03B$7.70B$4.55B$30.79B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$298M$0.00$634M$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-124M$298M$-327M$-27M$1.39B
Gross Margin89.7%87.9%26.1%
Operating Margin41.7%5.2%13.9%
Forward P/E16.5x40.6x14.2x
Total Debt$40M$75M$110K$483M$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$36M$80M$357M$214M$1.98B

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZNTL
AUPH
PRAX
FOLD
IQV
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL)1009.5-90.5%
Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH)100100.9+0.9%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10081.1-18.9%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100117.8+17.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AUPH leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. FOLD and IQV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇AUPH emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ZNTL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Growth Play

AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
  • 499.2% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 147.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 5.25x
  • 20.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +491.9% vs IQV's +14.0%
Best for: momentum
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 0.48
  • Beta 0.48, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.48 vs ZNTL's 2.26
Best for: income & stability and defensive
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Play

IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAUPH logoAUPH20.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVLower P/E (14.2x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsAUPH logoAUPH100.0% margin vs FOLD's -4.3%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.48 vs ZNTL's 2.26
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs IQV's +14.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AUPH logoAUPH47.6% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 16.6% vs -40.5%

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZNTLZentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$67M
AUPHAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2025
Product
95.9%$271M
License, Collaboration and Royalty Revenue
4.1%$12M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAUPHLAGGINGZNTL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. AUPH is the more profitable business, keeping 100.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOLD's -4.3%. On growth, AUPH holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$298M$0$634M$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$144M$144M-$357M$40M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$124M$298M-$327M-$27M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$126M$166M-$283M$30M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.7%+87.9%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.7%+5.2%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+100.0%-4.3%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+55.5%+4.7%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.4%+23.7%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.4%+56.3%+2.7%-89.0%+15.0%
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.6x trailing earnings, AUPH trades at a 67% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$267M$2.0B$7.7B$4.5B$30.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$271M$2.0B$7.3B$4.8B$45.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.96x7.64x-19.77x-164.85x23.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.48x40.62x14.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.77x114.88x13.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.19x7.17x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x3.77x6.83x16.29x4.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.03x152.43x15.01x
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AUPH delivers a 64.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $64 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ZNTL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs ZNTL's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-53.6%+64.5%-43.0%-12.0%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-40.7%+47.6%-40.2%-3.2%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.5%+16.6%-65.0%+5.3%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.5%+18.9%-49.3%+5.1%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–917344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.13x0.00x1.76x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$5M-$357M$269M$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$36M$80M$357M$214M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$40M$75M$110,000$483M$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.47x1.00x3.10x
AUPH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $13,517 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $669 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs IQV's +14.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ZNTL's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+173.7%+3.1%-6.9%+1.5%-19.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+156.8%+92.2%+491.9%+134.8%+14.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.5%+57.9%+1757.4%+11.6%-14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.3%+25.2%-14.2%+35.2%-25.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.8%+499.2%-36.1%+147.3%+177.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-46.2%+16.4%+164.8%+3.7%-5.0%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ZNTL's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x0.95x1.55x0.48x1.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.95$16.88$366.52$14.50$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$7.29$37.19$5.51$153.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+93.7%+72.7%+99.9%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.553.231.972.254.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M1.1M396K2.3M1.5M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZNTL as "Buy", AUPH as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 166.7% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs -20.4% for AUPH (target: $13).

MetricZNTL logoZNTLZentalis Pharmace…AUPH logoAUPHAurinia Pharmaceu…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$12.60$607.15$14.50$222.22
# AnalystsCovering analysts1214162444
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.8%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AUPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZNTL vs AUPH vs PRAX vs FOLD vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

On trailing P/E, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +35. 2%, compared to -93. 3% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AUPH returned +499. 2% versus ZNTL's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 369% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUPH leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUPH leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 166. 7% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ZNTL or AUPH or PRAX or FOLD or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), +147. 3% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +147. 3%, ZNTL: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZNTL and AUPH and PRAX and FOLD and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.