Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $295M | $5.53B | $2.22B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $158M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-464M | $-107M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 89.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -80.8% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $98K | $3M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $714M | $197M | $357M |
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zura Bio Limited (ZURA) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 160.4 | +60.4% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 2745.3 | +2645.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZURA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 5.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs DAWN's -8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
DAWN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.35
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- 20.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.35 vs ZURA's 1.88
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs IMVT's +96.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs ZURA's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs IMVT's +96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.7% ROA vs ZURA's -65.9% |
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ZURA leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAWN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAWN and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $158M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $158M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | -$487M | -$124M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$464M | -$107M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$73M | -$423M | -$108M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +89.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -80.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -67.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -68.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +83.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.5% | +19.7% | +70.0% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZURA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $295M | $5.5B | $2.2B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $186M | $4.8B | $2.0B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.28x | -9.97x | -20.70x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 14.06x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.21x | 5.83x | 5.05x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN delivers a -23.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-74 for ZURA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DAWN's 0.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAWN scores 4/9 vs ZURA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.7% | -47.1% | -23.4% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.9% | -44.1% | -20.7% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -30.5% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.5% | -66.1% | -26.7% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$109M | -$714M | -$194M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $714M | $197M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $98,000 | $3M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,271 for ZURA. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IMVT's +96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs ZURA's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.2% | +5.1% | +143.3% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +269.1% | +96.1% | +241.7% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.8% | +40.9% | +65.1% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +62.4% | -8.4% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +173.6% | -8.4% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +12.1% | +18.2% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZURA's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ZURA's 61.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.37x | 0.35x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.44 | $30.09 | $21.53 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $13.36 | $5.64 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.0% | +90.5% | +100.0% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 60.2 | 80.3 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 589K | 1.4M | 4.9M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZURA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 230.4% upside for ZURA (target: $15) vs 10.3% for DAWN (target: $24).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $45.50 | $23.75 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 23 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ZURA vs IMVT vs DAWN vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Zura Bio Limited (ZURA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -37. 3% for Zura Bio Limited (ZURA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus ZURA's -37. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Zura Bio Limited's 1. 88β — meaning ZURA is approximately 430% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 1% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS -2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -76. 7% for Zura Bio Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX?
Zura Bio Limited (ZURA) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZURA leads at 0. 0% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAWN leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ZURA or IMVT or DAWN or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35)). Zura Bio Limited (ZURA) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAWN: -8. 4%, ZURA: -37. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ZURA and IMVT and DAWN and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZURA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.