Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $650M | $3.86B | $5.35B | $1.69B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $122M | $1.10B | $827M | $55M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $124M | $376M | $-187M | $-164M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 85.8% | 91.5% | 49.7% | 99.6% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 7.4% | -8.3% | -237.9% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 50.9x | 8.3x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $63M | $52M | $492M | $149M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $178M | $985M | $15M | $1.98B |
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zevra Therapeutics,… (ZVRA) | 100 | 365.7 | +265.7% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZVRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 350.9%, EPS growth 159.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 118.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 5.68x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 5.68x
ACAD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.1x)
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +8.2% vs IQV's +16.5%
Among these 5 stocks, IQV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 350.9% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 101.6% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 45.6% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC -2.9% vs -57.2% |
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZVRA leads in 2 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • ACAD leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZVRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 301.1x NKTR's $55M. ZVRA is the more profitable business, keeping 101.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, ZVRA holds the edge at +77.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $122M | $1.1B | $827M | $55M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $96M | -$37M | -$130M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $376M | -$187M | -$164M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $212M | -$229M | -$209M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.8% | +91.5% | +49.7% | +99.6% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +7.4% | -8.3% | -2.4% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +101.6% | +34.3% | -22.6% | -3.0% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +19.4% | -27.7% | -3.8% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.5% | +9.7% | -76.8% | -25.3% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | -81.8% | -100.3% | -4.5% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and IQV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ZVRA trades at a 64% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $650M | $3.9B | $5.3B | $1.7B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $651M | $3.7B | $4.9B | $1.8B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.15x | 9.85x | 8.29x | -8.57x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.60x | 50.91x | — | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.91x | 5.42x | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 3.61x | 3.09x | 30.64x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.07x | 3.15x | — | 15.66x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.74x | 7.61x | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ZVRA and ACAD and PTCT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZVRA delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | +35.6% | — | -4.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +45.6% | +26.2% | -6.8% | -62.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +10.0% | — | -57.2% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.2% | +10.1% | +55.9% | -55.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.04x | — | 1.66x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $800,000 | -$126M | -$492M | $134M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $178M | $985M | $15M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $52M | $492M | $149M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.02x | — | -1.67x | -4.74x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,765 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.9% | -13.7% | -16.0% | +92.0% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.5% | +52.4% | +58.2% | +818.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.6% | +4.7% | +16.1% | +621.8% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +7.1% | +60.3% | -72.3% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | -22.9% | +733.2% | -59.1% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.8% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +93.3% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ZVRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZVRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZVRA currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.26x | 1.13x | 1.85x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.16 | $27.81 | $87.50 | $109.00 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.16 | $14.45 | $37.94 | $7.99 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +81.1% | +73.7% | +76.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 44.2 | 45.3 | 53.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.8M | 1.0M | 991K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZVRA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for ZVRA (target: $24) vs 26.3% for IQV (target: $226).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.25 | $34.78 | $89.67 | $132.83 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 37 | 26 | 33 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
ZVRA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ZVRA vs ACAD vs PTCT vs NKTR vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the stronger pick with 350. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus ZVRA's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 191% more volatile than ZVRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is pulling ahead at 350. 9% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZVRA leads at 118. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the more profitable company, earning 78. 2% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 78. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 36. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZVRA: 120. 5% to $24. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZVRA or ACAD or PTCT or NKTR or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZVRA and ACAD and PTCT and NKTR and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZVRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.