Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZYME vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ZYME vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.05B | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $106M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-81M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 98.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -87.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | 23.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $18M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $194M |
ZYME vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZYME vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZYME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.97
- Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -36.4%
- 112.4% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 0.3% margin vs ZYME's -76.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs ZYME's -76.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +135.2% vs DBVT's +114.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
ZYME vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZYME vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZYME and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $106M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$81M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -33.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -77.4% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZYME and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.56x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.28x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.27x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.36x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.75x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZYME leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZYME delivers a -26.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-26 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ZYME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZYME scores 5/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.0% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.3% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZYME leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZYME five years ago would be worth $9,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, ZYME leads with a +135.2% total return vs DBVT's +114.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZYME at 46.6% vs DBVT's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.7% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +135.2% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.2% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.4% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.4% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.6% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ZYME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZYME is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZYME currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.75 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.86 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 615K | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZYME as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 38.8% for ZYME (target: $38).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.33 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% |
ZYME leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DBVT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ZYME vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZYME or DBVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Zymeworks Inc.
(ZYME) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZYME or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Zymeworks Inc.
(ZYME) delivered a total return of -6. 4%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZYME returned +112. 4% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZYME or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zymeworks Inc.
(ZYME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 30% more volatile than ZYME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZYME or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zymeworks Inc.
grew EPS 33. 3% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZYME or DBVT?
DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -76. 6% for Zymeworks Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DBVT leads at 0. 0% versus -87. 3% for ZYME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZYME leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZYME or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 130.
5% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZYME or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ZYME or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zymeworks Inc.
(ZYME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), +112. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZYME: +112. 4%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZYME and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZYME is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.