Financial - Conglomerates
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $98M | $29.53B | $7.70B | $1.07T | $30.79B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $9.86B | $0.00 | $72.25B | $16.63B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $1.37B | $-327M | $25.27B | $1.39B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 86.4% | 69.8% | — | 83.5% | 26.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -250.1% | 15.6% | — | 45.9% | 13.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.7x | — | 30.9x | 14.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6.95B | $110K | $42.50B | $16.17B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $3.01B | $357M | $7.16B | $1.98B | $10.27B |
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Cognition Inc… (ACOG) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 332.5 | +232.5% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 90.4 | -9.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.9 | +28.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, ACOG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BIIB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.40 vs PRAX's 1.55
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +491.9% vs ACOG's -34.4%
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Beta 0.53, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.58x
- 44.7% revenue growth vs ACOG's -116.5%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs KO's 2.26
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs ACOG's -116.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs ACOG's -232.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs ACOG's -34.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs ACOG's -41.8%, ROIC 41.8% vs -32.4% |
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • BIIB leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • ACOG leads 0 • IQV leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACOG's -2.3%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $9.9B | $0 | $72.2B | $16.6B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $2.4B | -$357M | $34.7B | $3.5B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $1.4B | -$327M | $25.3B | $1.4B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | $2.6B | -$283M | $13.6B | $2.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.4% | +69.8% | — | +83.5% | +26.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +15.6% | — | +45.9% | +13.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +13.9% | — | +35.0% | +8.3% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +26.6% | — | +18.8% | +16.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.9% | — | +55.5% | +8.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -146.2% | +31.1% | +2.7% | +169.9% | +15.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, BIIB trades at a 54% valuation discount to LLY's 49.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $29.5B | $7.7B | $1.07T | $30.8B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $33.5B | $7.3B | $1.11T | $45.0B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.38x | 22.66x | -19.77x | 49.37x | 23.15x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.69x | — | 30.95x | 14.16x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.71x | 0.57x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.90x | — | 35.38x | 13.11x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.57x | 3.01x | — | 16.42x | 1.89x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 1.61x | 6.83x | 38.34x | 4.75x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.40x | — | 119.31x | 15.01x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ACOG. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.1% | +7.5% | -43.0% | +101.2% | +22.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.8% | +4.7% | -40.2% | +22.7% | +4.7% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.4% | +6.5% | -65.0% | +41.8% | +8.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.4% | +7.7% | -49.3% | +46.6% | +11.0% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.38x | 0.00x | 1.60x | 2.44x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $3.9B | -$357M | $35.3B | $14.2B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $3.0B | $357M | $7.2B | $2.0B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6.9B | $110,000 | $42.5B | $16.2B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.91x | — | 35.68x | 3.10x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,926 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs ACOG's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs BIIB's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +12.5% | -6.9% | +5.2% | -19.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | +51.2% | +491.9% | +40.3% | +14.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -36.2% | +1757.4% | +158.2% | -14.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -50.7% | -14.2% | +412.1% | -25.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -18.1% | -36.1% | +1484.6% | +177.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | -13.9% | +164.8% | +37.2% | -5.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ACOG's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.40x | 1.55x | 0.53x | 1.16x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.54 | $205.97 | $366.52 | $1182.73 | $247.05 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.50 | $121.05 | $37.19 | $623.78 | $153.01 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.6% | +97.1% | +72.7% | +95.8% | +73.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.5 | 31.9 | 70.0 | 54.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.1M | 396K | 2.6M | 1.5M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACOG as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs LLY's 0.53%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $218.16 | $607.15 | $1268.94 | $222.22 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 48 | 16 | 45 | 44 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.5% | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 11 | 2 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.00 | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.0% | +0.2% |
LLY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
ACOG vs BIIB vs PRAX vs LLY vs IQV vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Biogen Inc. (BIIB) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
On trailing P/E, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the cheapest at 22. 7x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 49. 4x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -50. 7% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus PRAX's -36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately -875% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus -202. 2% for Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus -221. 7% for ACOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc. (BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Eli Lilly and Company — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), LLY (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ACOG, BIIB, PRAX, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACOG or BIIB or PRAX or LLY or IQV or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACOG and BIIB and PRAX and LLY and IQV and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACOG (Financial Services) and BIIB (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and LLY (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LLY, KO pay a dividend while ACOG, BIIB, PRAX, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.