Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AEON logo
AEON
ACTU logo
ACTU
NUVL logo
NUVL
PRAX logo
PRAX
IQV logo
IQV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
ACTU
Actuate Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$48M
5Y Perf.-74.9%
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.07B
5Y Perf.+44.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.+401.5%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.-27.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+42.7%

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AEON logoAEON
ACTU logoACTU
NUVL logoNUVL
PRAX logoPRAX
IQV logoIQV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$9M$48M$9.07B$7.70B$30.79B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$16.63B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$-22M$-450M$-327M$1.39B$57.05B
Gross Margin26.1%60.0%
Operating Margin13.9%25.9%
Forward P/E14.2x14.4x
Total Debt$36M$405K$0.00$110K$16.17B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$13M$262M$357M$1.98B$343.34B

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AEON
ACTU
NUVL
PRAX
IQV
JPM
StockAug 24Jun 26Return
AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON)1001.2-98.8%
Actuate Therapeutic… (ACTU)10025.1-74.9%
Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL)100144.8+44.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100501.5+401.5%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)10072.1-27.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100142.7+42.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IQV and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. AEON, ACTU, and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

AEON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.11 vs ACTU's 2.21
Best for: stability
ACTU
Actuate Therapeutics Inc
The Growth Leader

ACTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 23.4% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
Best for: growth
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
  • Beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +491.9% vs ACTU's -76.5%
Best for: momentum
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

IQV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
  • PEG 0.35 vs JPM's 0.81
  • Better valuation composite
  • 4.7% ROA vs AEON's -7.0%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs ACTU's 1.9%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACTU logoACTU23.4% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
ValueIQV logoIQVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ACTU's 1.9%
Stability / SafetyAEON logoAEONBeta 0.11 vs ACTU's 2.21
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs ACTU's -76.5%
Efficiency (ROA)IQV logoIQV4.7% ROA vs AEON's -7.0%

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
AEONAEON Biopharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACTUActuate Therapeutics Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

NUVLNuvalent, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIQVLAGGINGPRAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQV's 8.3%.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$0$0$16.6B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M-$22M-$346M-$357M$3.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M-$22M-$450M-$327M$1.4B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M-$20M-$313M-$283M$2.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.5%+25.0%-17.8%+2.7%+15.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 31% valuation discount to IQV's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$9M$48M$9.1B$7.7B$30.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$36M$8.8B$7.3B$45.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.18x-1.91x-21.07x-19.77x23.15x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.16x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.11x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.89x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.36x7.18x6.83x4.75x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.01x8.88x
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ACTU. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.3%-42.8%-43.0%+22.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%-180.9%-37.8%-40.2%+4.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-32.5%-65.0%+8.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.1%-34.4%-49.3%+11.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9241345
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.00x2.44x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$33M-$13M-$262M-$357M$14.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$13M$262M$357M$2.0B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$404,991$0$110,000$16.2B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1073.65x-36.13x3.10x0.74x
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NUVL and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $65,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for AEON. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs ACTU's -76.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs AEON's -89.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.2%-66.5%+22.2%-6.9%-19.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.1%-76.5%+58.2%+491.9%+14.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-76.5%+183.3%+1757.4%-14.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-76.5%+557.3%-14.2%-25.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-76.5%+557.3%-36.1%+177.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.7%-38.3%+41.5%+164.8%-5.0%+33.6%
Evenly matched — NUVL and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AEON and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AEON is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACTU's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs ACTU's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.11x2.21x0.87x1.55x1.16x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.45$9.25$123.62$366.52$247.05$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.63$1.60$71.13$37.19$153.01$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.4%+21.8%+99.7%+72.7%+73.5%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.739.067.031.954.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded85K178K2.0M396K1.5M7.0M
Evenly matched — AEON and NUVL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ACTU as "Buy", NUVL as "Hold", PRAX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 939.6% upside for ACTU (target: $21) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…ACTU logoACTUActuate Therapeut…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.00$132.74$607.15$222.22$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts117164461
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). IQV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallIQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AEON vs ACTU vs NUVL vs PRAX vs IQV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Actuate Therapeutics Inc (ACTU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.

(NUVL) delivered a total return of +557. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +557. 3% versus AEON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AEON Biopharma, Inc.

(AEON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Actuate Therapeutics Inc's 2. 21β — meaning ACTU is approximately 1998% more volatile than AEON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Actuate Therapeutics Inc grew EPS 67. 5% year-over-year, compared to -105. 4% for AEON Biopharma, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACTU: 939. 6% to $21. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AEON, ACTU, NUVL, PRAX, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AEON or ACTU or NUVL or PRAX or IQV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Actuate Therapeutics Inc (ACTU) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ACTU: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AEON and ACTU and NUVL and PRAX and IQV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (AEON (Healthcare) and ACTU (Healthcare) and NUVL (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AEON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while AEON, ACTU, NUVL, PRAX, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.