Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ALRS logo
ALRS
NBTB logo
NBTB
TRMK logo
TRMK
FULT logo
FULT
IBCP logo
IBCP
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALRS
Alerus Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$774M
5Y Perf.+53.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.70B
5Y Perf.+87.2%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALRS logoALRS
NBTB logoNBTB
TRMK logoTRMK
FULT logoFULT
IBCP logoIBCP
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$774M$2.52B$2.70B$4.50B$730M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$330M$902M$1.16B$1.89B$310M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$27M$169M$224M$392M$69M$57.05B
Gross Margin70.6%73.6%64.7%67.4%69.1%60.0%
Operating Margin10.7%24.3%24.2%25.7%26.2%25.9%
Forward P/E10.3x11.5x11.8x11.5x10.0x14.4x
Total Debt$441M$327M$1.12B$1.30B$117M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$67M$185M$668M$271M$52M$343.34B

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALRS
NBTB
TRMK
FULT
IBCP
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS)100153.3+53.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK)100187.2+87.2%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Alerus Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. TRMK, FULT, and IBCP also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ALRS
Alerus Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

ALRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +44.4% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Best for: momentum
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
The Banking Pick

TRMK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.

  • NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs ALRS's -3.1%
Best for: bank quality
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7%
Best for: dividends
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • PEG 0.81 vs IBCP's 1.90
  • PEG 0.81 vs 1.46
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRMK logoTRMK34.8% NII/revenue growth vs ALRS's -3.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMPEG 0.81 vs 1.46
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.72 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage
DividendsFULT logoFULT3.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)ALRS logoALRS+44.4% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6%

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALRSAlerus Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Retirement and Benefit Services
63.7%$66M
Wealth Management
27.3%$28M
Interchange Fees
3.3%$3M
Deposit Account
2.7%$3M
Transactional Fees
1.8%$2M
Other Noninterest
1.2%$1M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
TRMKTrustmark Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGFULT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$330M$902M$1.2B$1.9B$310M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$49M$241M$323M$529M$89M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$27M$169M$224M$392M$69M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$95M$225M$230M$267M$70M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+73.6%+64.7%+67.4%+69.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+24.3%+24.2%+25.7%+26.2%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.2%+18.8%+19.3%+20.7%+22.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+28.9%+24.9%+19.8%+14.1%+22.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.1%+39.5%+5.4%+47.2%+2.3%+16.0%
IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 76% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs IBCP's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$774M$2.5B$2.7B$4.5B$730M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$2.7B$3.2B$5.5B$795M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS44.56x14.47x12.41x11.23x10.85x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.33x11.54x11.75x11.49x9.99x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.06x1.54x0.80x2.06x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.78x11.03x9.67x10.43x9.78x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.36x2.90x2.41x2.38x2.32x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.38x1.29x1.31x1.23x1.47x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.16x11.49x11.65x15.81x10.41x8.88x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+9.5%+10.8%+11.6%+14.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.1%+1.2%+1.2%+1.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.9%+7.9%+7.1%+7.5%+10.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.8%+2.4%+3.2%+9.5%+2.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9577685
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.17x0.53x0.37x0.23x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$373M$142M$448M$1.0B$65M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$67M$185M$668M$271M$52M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$441M$327M$1.1B$1.3B$117M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.35x1.05x0.75x0.84x0.91x0.74x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,474 for ALRS. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs IBCP's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+35.9%+17.6%+18.7%+21.0%+12.0%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.4%+18.3%+35.5%+37.8%+16.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.7%+48.5%+115.6%+96.0%+110.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.7%+44.4%+56.8%+61.1%+80.9%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+106.8%+108.5%+127.3%+114.2%+194.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.6%+14.1%+29.2%+25.1%+28.1%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ALRS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x0.76x0.82x0.99x0.72x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.35$48.27$46.03$23.48$39.16$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.26$39.20$33.39$16.60$29.63$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.8%+99.8%+99.7%+99.5%+90.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.463.160.168.161.259.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded154K266K330K1.7M135K7.0M
Evenly matched — ALRS and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ALRS and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ALRS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.30% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.TRMK logoTRMKTrustmark Corpora…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.75$46.00$45.50$23.50$38.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts510920761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.0%+2.1%+3.3%+2.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3313151115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.81$1.43$0.97$0.77$1.03$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.4%+3.0%+1.5%+1.7%+3.9%
Evenly matched — ALRS and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALRS vs NBTB vs TRMK vs FULT vs IBCP vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +4. 7% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 37% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.

8% versus -3. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 7. 1% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is ALRS or NBTB or TRMK or FULT or IBCP or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALRS and NBTB and TRMK and FULT and IBCP and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.