Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $12.11B | $29.53B | $2.39B | $63.60B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.06B | $9.86B | $669M | $14.92B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $-327M | $1.37B | $-609M | $4.42B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.3% | 69.8% | 83.6% | 84.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -33.3% | 15.6% | -83.9% | 24.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.7x | — | 13.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.61B | $6.95B | $1.28B | $2.71B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $372M | $3.01B | $434M | $3.12B | $10.27B |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +164.3% vs RARE's -38.0%
IONS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 241.3% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
BIIB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.40 vs RARE's 1.43
RARE doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
REGN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 2.08 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 2.08 vs 2.26
- 29.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs -132.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 2.08 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs RARE's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.3% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
IONS leads 2 • BIIB leads 1 • AMLX leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • REGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $9.9B | $669M | $14.9B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $4.5B | $2.4B | -$536M | $4.2B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | -$327M | $1.4B | -$609M | $4.4B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$971M | $2.6B | -$487M | $4.2B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.3% | +69.8% | +83.6% | +84.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -33.3% | +15.6% | -83.9% | +24.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.9% | +13.9% | -91.0% | +29.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -91.8% | +26.6% | -72.8% | +27.9% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.0% | +1.9% | -2.4% | +19.0% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +39.8% | +31.1% | -17.2% | -7.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.33x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $12.1B | $29.5B | $2.4B | $63.6B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $992M | $14.4B | $33.5B | $3.2B | $63.2B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.54x | -30.79x | 22.66x | -4.18x | 14.76x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.69x | — | 13.18x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.33x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.90x | — | 15.33x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.83x | 3.01x | 3.56x | 4.43x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.52x | 23.97x | 1.61x | — | 2.13x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.40x | — | 15.59x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -58.6% | +7.5% | -6.1% | +14.3% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | -10.1% | +4.7% | -45.8% | +11.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | -12.8% | +6.5% | -89.4% | +8.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | -14.1% | +7.7% | -46.4% | +10.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 5.35x | 0.38x | — | 0.09x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | $2.2B | $3.9B | $842M | -$412M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $372M | $3.0B | $434M | $3.1B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.6B | $6.9B | $1.3B | $2.7B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.64x | 6.91x | -14.49x | 108.44x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,367 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +164.3% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs RARE's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | -8.0% | +12.5% | +3.2% | -20.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.3% | +105.7% | +51.2% | -38.0% | +18.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | +76.0% | -36.2% | -52.6% | -18.1% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +93.9% | -50.7% | -76.3% | +16.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.6% | +241.3% | -18.1% | -59.4% | +68.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.2% | +20.7% | -13.9% | -22.0% | -6.4% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.42x | 0.40x | 1.43x | 0.51x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $86.74 | $205.97 | $42.37 | $821.11 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $34.78 | $121.05 | $18.29 | $503.25 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +84.5% | +97.1% | +57.5% | +74.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 46.2 | 57.5 | 53.2 | 37.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.6M | 1.1M | 1.5M | 868K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $107.27 | $218.16 | $48.36 | $836.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 32 | 48 | 33 | 48 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.41 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). IONS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -76. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning RARE is approximately -816% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 65. 5% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RARE leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 98. 6% to $48. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. AMLX, IONS, BIIB, RARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and IONS and BIIB and RARE and REGN and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMLX (Healthcare) and IONS (Healthcare) and BIIB (Healthcare) and RARE (Healthcare) and REGN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. REGN, KO pay a dividend while AMLX, IONS, BIIB, RARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.