Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AMTB logo
AMTB
IBCP logo
IBCP
SFNC logo
SFNC
BANR logo
BANR
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$991M
5Y Perf.+56.9%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$706M
5Y Perf.+131.0%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+28.0%
BANR
Banner Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.20B
5Y Perf.+70.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMTB logoAMTB
IBCP logoIBCP
SFNC logoSFNC
BANR logoBANR
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$991M$706M$3.18B$2.20B$341.71B
Revenue (TTM)$521M$310M$618M$819M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$58M$69M$-398M$195M$13.70B
Gross Margin55.6%69.1%4.5%79.0%61.7%
Operating Margin9.7%26.2%-85.4%29.5%29.3%
Forward P/E13.1x9.7x10.6x10.5x24.3x
Total Debt$1.04B$117M$641M$373M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$470M$52M$380M$183M$10.27B

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMTB
IBCP
SFNC
BANR
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB)100156.9+56.9%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100231.0+131.0%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100128.0+28.0%
Banner Corporation (BANR)100170.6+70.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMTB and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. IBCP, SFNC, and BANR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

AMTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
  • NIM 3.7% vs SFNC's 2.9%
  • 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
  • +44.5% vs BANR's +7.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 186.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Lower P/E (9.7x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.83 vs 2.17
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
  • 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability
BANR
Banner Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.91 vs KO's 2.17
  • Beta 0.66 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
Best for: valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs SFNC's -64.3%
  • 13.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMTB logoAMTB14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueIBCP logoIBCPLower P/E (9.7x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.83 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SFNC's -64.3%
Stability / SafetyBANR logoBANRBeta 0.66 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
DividendsSFNC logoSFNC3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)AMTB logoAMTB+44.5% vs BANR's +7.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.1%

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMTBAmerant Bancorp Inc.
FY 2018
Corporate LATAM
100.0%$1.0B
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M
BANRBanner Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
65.3%$25M
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
34.7%$14M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGAMTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BANR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 159.1x IBCP's $310M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$521M$310M$618M$819M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$54M$89M-$444M$253M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$58M$69M-$398M$195M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$111M$70M$410M$248M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%+69.1%+4.5%+79.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.7%+26.2%-85.4%+29.5%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%+22.1%-64.3%+23.8%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.4%+22.6%+66.4%+30.3%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.1%+2.3%+42.1%+11.2%+18.2%
BANR leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 0.99x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$991M$706M$3.2B$2.2B$341.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$771M$3.4B$2.4B$376.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.73x10.49x-7.42x11.49x26.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.13x9.66x10.61x10.53x24.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.99x0.99x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.07x9.48x9.45x25.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x2.24x5.07x2.68x7.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x1.42x0.86x1.15x9.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.12x10.07x7.52x8.86x64.52x
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+14.2%-11.5%+10.3%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.3%-1.6%+1.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%+10.2%-9.1%+7.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+2.6%-4.2%+10.1%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978477
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.11x0.23x0.19x0.19x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$571M$65M$261M$190M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$470M$52M$380M$183M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$117M$641M$373M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.29x0.91x-1.01x1.11x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $18,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs BANR's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.6% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.6%+8.3%+18.7%+5.4%+16.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%+16.5%+25.0%+7.4%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.9%+112.6%+34.8%+53.9%+39.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.7%+85.3%-8.5%+40.0%+65.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.4%+186.7%+25.0%+100.4%+115.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%+28.6%+10.5%+15.4%+11.7%
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x0.68x0.84x0.65x-0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.38$39.16$22.62$69.83$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.62$29.63$17.00$57.05$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.8%+87.6%+96.8%+92.8%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.449.352.848.549.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded226K139K1.1M223K13.6M
Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -0.9% for BANR (target: $64). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs AMTB's 1.18%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…BANR logoBANRBanner CorporationKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$38.00$23.00$64.25$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts7791348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.0%+3.9%+3.0%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01114156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$1.03$0.85$1.96$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%+1.8%0.0%+1.6%+0.2%
Evenly matched — SFNC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BANR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 91x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +85.

3%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +186. 7% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately -494% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANR leads at 29. 5% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).

09

Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMTB and IBCP and SFNC and BANR and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMTB (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.