Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Diversified
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $12.95B | $5.40B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.63B | $1.31B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $360M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 63.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 66.2% | 49.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.4x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $15.99B | $9.30B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $924M | $10M | $343.34B |
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Blue Owl Capital Co… (OBDC) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 1.71x
- Beta 0.65, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.71x
OBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 52.6%, EPS growth -19.0%
- NIM 7.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 150.1%
- PEG 0.83 vs OBDC's 1.91
- +20.9% vs OBDC's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs JPM's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs OBDC's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs JPM's 0.3% |
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 214.0x OBDC's $1.3B. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $1.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $650M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $360M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $1.1B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +63.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +49.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +27.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +82.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.9% | -110.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OBDC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, OBDC trades at a 46% valuation discount to JPM's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs OBDC's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.9B | $5.4B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.0B | $14.7B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.69x | 8.77x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 8.42x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 1.99x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.79x | 11.85x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.12x | 3.22x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.74x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.34x | 3.10x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OBDC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for OBDC. ARCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OBDC scores 5/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +4.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +2.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +6.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +7.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 1.26x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.1B | $9.3B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $924M | $10M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.0B | $9.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 1.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,918 for OBDC. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.9% total return vs OBDC's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs OBDC's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | -10.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | -15.2% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | +14.5% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +29.2% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.1% | +37.6% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +4.6% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARCC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs OBDC's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.77x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.42 | $15.19 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.40 | $10.52 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +71.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 40.1 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 3.7M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OBDC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCC as "Buy", OBDC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for OBDC (target: $13) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, OBDC offers the higher dividend yield at 13.68% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $13.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 13 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +13.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.49 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +3.8% |
OBDC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ARCC vs OBDC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is the stronger pick with 52.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is the cheapest at 8.
8x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, Blue Owl Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus Blue Owl Capital Corporation's 1. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +29. 2% for Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus OBDC's +37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately 34% more volatile than ARCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is pulling ahead at 52.
6% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
3% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OBDC leads at 73. 2% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Blue Owl Capital Corporation's 1. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OBDC: 19. 6% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARCC or OBDC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) offers the highest yield at 13. 7%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is ARCC or OBDC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, OBDC: +37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARCC and OBDC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.