Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AUB logo
AUB
NBTB logo
NBTB
FULT logo
FULT
IBCP logo
IBCP
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.77B
5Y Perf.+74.0%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AUB logoAUB
NBTB logoNBTB
FULT logoFULT
IBCP logoIBCP
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$5.77B$2.52B$4.50B$730M$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$2.02B$902M$1.89B$310M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$274M$169M$392M$69M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin60.9%73.6%67.4%69.1%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin16.8%24.3%25.7%26.2%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E10.8x11.5x11.5x10.0x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$1.50B$327M$1.30B$117M$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$234M$185M$271M$52M$10.27B$343.34B

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AUB
NBTB
FULT
IBCP
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Atlantic Union Bank… (AUB)100174.0+74.0%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AUB and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FULT, IBCP, and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

AUB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 3.7%
  • 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
  • 3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Financial Play

NBTB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 32.5%
  • +37.8% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Best for: growth exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Beta 0.72 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs AUB's 13.5%
  • 13.1% ROA vs AUB's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • PEG 0.81 vs AUB's 10.65
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAUB logoAUB28.2% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs AUB's 13.5%
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.72 vs AUB's 1.11, lower leverage
DividendsAUB logoAUB3.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)FULT logoFULT+37.8% vs IBCP's +16.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs AUB's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0%

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AUBAtlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
FY 2020
Overdraft Fees Net
28.5%$18M
Trust Asset Management Fees
17.3%$11M
Registered Advisor Management Fees Net
13.9%$9M
Maintenance Fees Other
12.0%$7M
Interchange Fees Net
11.5%$7M
Financial Service Other
10.1%$6M
Brokerage Management Fees Net
6.7%$4M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFULT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUB's 13.5%.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$902M$1.9B$310M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$397M$241M$529M$89M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$274M$169M$392M$69M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.2B$225M$267M$70M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.9%+73.6%+67.4%+69.1%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.8%+24.3%+25.7%+26.2%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.5%+18.8%+20.7%+22.1%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+109.7%+24.9%+14.1%+22.6%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.3%+39.5%+47.2%+2.3%+18.2%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs AUB's 19.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$2.5B$4.5B$730M$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.0B$2.7B$5.5B$795M$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.85x14.47x11.23x10.85x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.82x11.54x11.49x9.99x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate19.55x2.06x0.80x2.06x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.81x11.03x10.43x9.78x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.34x2.90x2.38x2.32x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.04x1.29x1.23x1.47x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.48x11.49x15.81x10.41x67.15x8.88x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for AUB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs AUB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.1%+9.5%+11.6%+14.2%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+1.1%+1.2%+1.3%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+7.9%+7.5%+10.2%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.6%+2.4%+9.5%+2.6%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9376875
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.17x0.37x0.23x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$142M$1.0B$65M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$234M$185M$271M$52M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$327M$1.3B$117M$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x1.05x0.84x0.91x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,094 for AUB. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs IBCP's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.5%+17.6%+21.0%+12.0%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.5%+18.3%+37.8%+16.4%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.3%+48.5%+96.0%+110.4%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.9%+44.4%+61.1%+80.9%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.1%+108.5%+114.2%+194.4%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.8%+14.1%+25.1%+28.1%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.11x0.76x0.99x0.72x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.18$48.27$23.48$39.16$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.64$39.20$16.60$29.63$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+99.8%+99.5%+90.6%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.963.168.161.260.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded878K266K1.7M135K12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AUB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AUB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.9% upside for AUB (target: $46) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, AUB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.69% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$45.50$46.00$23.50$38.00$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts18102074861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%+3.0%+3.3%+2.9%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15135115615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.49$1.43$0.77$1.03$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%+1.5%+1.7%+0.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — AUB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AUB vs NBTB vs FULT vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is the stronger pick with 28.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +20. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AUB's +95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning AUB is approximately -653% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is pulling ahead at 28.

2% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 15. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 19. 5% for AUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AUB: 12. 9% to $45. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is AUB or NBTB or FULT or IBCP or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AUB: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AUB and NBTB and FULT and IBCP and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (AUB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AUB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.