Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Software - Application
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Software - Application | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $43M | $505M | $2.08B | $16K | $2M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $335M | $927M | $12M | $41M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $107M | $303M | $-156M | $-12M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 63.8% | 66.5% | 15.2% | 30.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 42.6% | 47.9% | -7.2% | -26.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 10.9x | 9.3x | 0.0x | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $152M | $68M | $2M | $9M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $199M | $1.21B | $6M | $34M | $10.27B |
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 941.4 | +841.4% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 225.0 | +125.0% |
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Universe Pharmaceut… (UPC) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, BYNO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACIC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.10 vs NXTT's 1.74
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 491.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 0.19 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.36, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.24x
NXTT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9%
UPC doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs HCI's 0.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
- +17.2% vs NXTT's -99.3%
- 13.1% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.19 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.6% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs NXTT's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs HCI's 0.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs NXTT's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -22.5% |
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • BYNO leads 0 • ACIC leads 0 • NXTT leads 0 • UPC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 36416.8x BYNO's $1M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 32.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $335M | $927M | $12M | $41M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $154M | $454M | -$86M | -$10M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | $107M | $303M | -$156M | -$12M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $71M | $282M | $145M | -$15M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +63.8% | +66.5% | +15.2% | +30.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +42.6% | +47.9% | -7.2% | -26.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | +31.9% | +32.6% | -12.9% | -30.3% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +21.1% | +30.4% | +12.0% | -37.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.3% | +11.9% | — | -14.1% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | +4.3% | +23.4% | -3.1% | -100.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HCI and NXTT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $505M | $2.1B | $16,069 | $2M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $459M | $942M | -$4M | -$23M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 4.86x | 6.45x | 0.00x | -0.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.94x | 9.26x | — | — | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.13x | 0.00x | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.81x | 2.14x | — | — | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.51x | 2.31x | 0.00x | 0.10x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.64x | 1.85x | 0.00x | 0.00x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.13x | 4.69x | — | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | +35.7% | +30.8% | -30.0% | -27.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +9.0% | +12.7% | -26.2% | -18.6% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +41.0% | +6.8% | -22.5% | -7.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +26.0% | +40.6% | -26.3% | -5.6% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.48x | 0.06x | 0.00x | 0.16x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$46M | -$1.1B | -$4M | -$24M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $199M | $1.2B | $6M | $34M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $152M | $68M | $2M | $9M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.20x | 67.37x | — | -22.11x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $19,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs NXTT's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 42.8% vs UPC's -90.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -1.6% | -12.3% | -73.5% | -22.1% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | +5.2% | +2.0% | -99.3% | -16.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +137.8% | +191.2% | -99.9% | -99.9% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | +98.7% | +83.5% | -100.0% | -100.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -24.1% | +491.7% | -100.0% | -100.0% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +33.5% | +42.8% | -89.5% | -90.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXTT's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.10x | 0.36x | 1.74x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $13.06 | $210.50 | $738.00 | $11.00 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $9.79 | $136.37 | $0.45 | $2.00 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +80.0% | +76.2% | +0.2% | +29.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 44.8 | 61.4 | 51.3 | 52.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 238K | 180K | 145K | 24K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -81.8% for ACIC (target: $2). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs HCI's 0.93%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.90 | $126.50 | — | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 14 | — | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.50 | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BYNO vs ACIC vs HCI vs NXTT vs UPC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, HCI Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +98.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +491. 7% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Next Technology Holding Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning NXTT is approximately -969% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus -22. 4% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus -690. 5% for NXTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), HCI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BYNO, ACIC, NXTT, UPC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYNO or ACIC or HCI or NXTT or UPC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NXTT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and ACIC and HCI and NXTT and UPC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYNO (Financial Services) and ACIC (Financial Services) and HCI (Financial Services) and NXTT (Technology) and UPC (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. HCI, KO pay a dividend while BYNO, ACIC, NXTT, UPC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.