Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBK logo
CBK
HOMB logo
HOMB
SFNC logo
SFNC
IBCP logo
IBCP
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBK
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock

Banks

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$422M
5Y Perf.+3.9%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+83.7%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.27B
5Y Perf.+31.6%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBK logoCBK
HOMB logoHOMB
SFNC logoSFNC
IBCP logoIBCP
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanksBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$422M$5.58B$3.27B$730M$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$129M$1.37B$618M$310M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$38M$475M$-398M$69M$57.05B
Gross Margin69.8%77.3%4.5%69.1%60.0%
Operating Margin37.5%43.8%-85.4%26.2%25.9%
Forward P/E10.5x11.5x10.9x10.0x14.4x
Total Debt$167M$935M$641M$117M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$0.00$667M$380M$52M$343.34B

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBK
HOMB
SFNC
IBCP
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100183.7+83.7%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100131.6+31.6%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CBK and SFNC are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Simmons First National Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CBK
Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock
The Banking Pick

CBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 58.5%, current ratio 0.14x
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • NIM 3.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.5x)
  • 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
  • +23.0% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Best for: value and dividends
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • PEG 0.81 vs IBCP's 1.90
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueSFNC logoSFNCLower P/E (10.9x vs 11.5x)
Quality / MarginsCBK logoCBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCBK logoCBKBeta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsSFNC logoSFNC3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)SFNC logoSFNC+23.0% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CBK logoCBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBKCommercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
53.7%$47M
Deposit Account
46.3%$40M
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHOMBLAGGINGCBK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2170.6x CBK's $129M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$129M$1.4B$618M$310M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$50M$618M-$444M$89M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$475M-$398M$69M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$37M$311M$410M$70M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.8%+77.3%+4.5%+69.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.5%+43.8%-85.4%+26.2%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.3%+34.6%-64.3%+22.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+28.4%+22.6%+66.4%+22.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%+26.0%+42.1%+2.3%+16.0%
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, CBK trades at a 34% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs IBCP's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$422M$5.6B$3.3B$730M$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$589M$5.9B$3.5B$795M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.54x11.72x-7.63x10.85x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.51x11.47x10.90x9.99x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.89x2.06x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.88x9.47x9.78x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.21x4.06x5.21x2.32x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.49x1.30x0.89x1.47x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.97x11.58x7.73x10.41x8.88x
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.3%+11.4%-11.5%+14.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+2.1%-1.6%+1.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.1%+8.7%-9.1%+10.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.8%+11.5%-4.2%+2.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956485
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.59x0.22x0.19x0.23x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$167M$268M$261M$65M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$0$667M$380M$52M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$167M$935M$641M$117M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.25x1.47x-1.01x0.91x0.74x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,847 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, SFNC leads with a +23.0% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CBK's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.6%+2.7%+20.7%+12.0%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.6%+3.0%+23.0%+16.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.6%+31.2%+37.1%+110.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.6%+22.1%-11.5%+80.9%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.6%+57.7%+26.2%+194.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.7%+9.5%+11.1%+28.1%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x0.66x0.89x0.72x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.67$30.83$22.62$39.16$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.32$25.50$17.00$29.63$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.2%+91.6%+99.5%+90.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.363.763.761.259.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded55K1.4M1.1M135K7.0M
Evenly matched — CBK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 2.2% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs CBK's 0.47%.

MetricCBK logoCBKCommercial Bancgr…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.50$23.00$38.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts199761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+2.8%+3.8%+2.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015141115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14$0.80$0.85$1.03$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+1.5%0.0%+1.7%+3.9%
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHome Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.

Common Stock (CBK) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -11. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CBK's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.

Common Stock (CBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 88% more volatile than CBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 19. 9% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK).

09

Is CBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, CBK: +21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBK and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. HOMB, SFNC, IBCP, JPM pay a dividend while CBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.