Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $808M | $4.50B | $2.52B | $5.58B | $20.26B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $1.02B | $902M | $1.37B | $11.66B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $277M | $169M | $475M | $2.67B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 51.8% | 73.6% | 77.3% | 37.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 33.6% | 24.3% | 43.8% | 17.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 12.9x | 11.5x | 11.5x | 6.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $1.51B | $327M | $935M | $4.01B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $95M | $185M | $667M | $599M | $10.27B |
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs SFBS's 260.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs SFBS's 3.0%
- Beta 0.56 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage
SFBS doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- 34.6% margin vs NBTB's 18.8%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.6% margin vs NBTB's 18.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9% |
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • SFBS leads 1 • CCBG leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CCBG and HOMB and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 176.5x CCBG's $279M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $1.0B | $902M | $1.4B | $11.7B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $346M | $241M | $618M | $4.1B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $277M | $169M | $475M | $2.7B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $351M | $225M | $311M | $2.8B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +51.8% | +73.6% | +77.3% | +37.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +33.6% | +24.3% | +43.8% | +17.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +27.2% | +18.8% | +34.6% | +22.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +34.5% | +24.9% | +22.6% | +23.9% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +32.8% | +39.5% | +26.0% | +30.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 78% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $4.5B | $2.5B | $5.6B | $20.3B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $5.9B | $2.7B | $5.9B | $23.7B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 16.28x | 14.47x | 11.72x | 52.27x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 12.87x | 11.54x | 11.47x | 6.24x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 1.61x | 2.06x | 0.89x | 2.14x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 17.29x | 11.03x | 9.47x | 6.50x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 4.43x | 2.90x | 4.06x | 1.90x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 2.43x | 1.29x | 1.30x | 1.46x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 12.89x | 11.49x | 11.58x | 7.21x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBS scores 8/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +15.8% | +9.5% | +11.4% | +18.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.6% | +1.1% | +2.1% | +7.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +7.3% | +7.9% | +8.7% | +6.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +4.5% | +2.4% | +11.5% | +6.6% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.81x | 0.17x | 0.22x | 0.29x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $1.4B | $142M | $268M | $3.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $95M | $185M | $667M | $599M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $1.5B | $327M | $935M | $4.0B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 0.75x | 1.05x | 1.47x | 21.16x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SFBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CCBG leads with a +27.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFBS at 24.5% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +15.8% | +17.6% | +2.7% | -38.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +12.8% | +18.3% | +3.0% | -49.4% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +92.8% | +48.5% | +31.2% | -18.9% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +27.6% | +44.4% | +22.1% | -67.3% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +260.6% | +108.5% | +57.7% | -25.6% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +24.5% | +14.1% | +9.5% | -6.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.06x | 0.76x | 0.66x | 0.61x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $90.64 | $48.27 | $30.83 | $82.74 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $67.20 | $39.20 | $25.50 | $37.91 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +90.9% | +99.8% | +91.6% | +47.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 65.1 | 63.1 | 63.7 | 30.8 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 211K | 266K | 1.4M | 5.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs SFBS's 1.62%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $90.00 | $46.00 | $31.50 | $62.88 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 37 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.6% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +4.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 1 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.34 | $1.43 | $0.80 | $1.63 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.5% | +7.0% | +0.2% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB vs FIS vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +260. 6% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SFBS is approximately -629% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 6% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS).
09Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB or FIS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SFBS: +260. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and SFBS and NBTB and HOMB and FIS and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and SFBS (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.