Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CWBC logo
CWBC
ICE logo
ICE
NDAQ logo
NDAQ
FIS logo
FIS
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CWBC
Community West Bancshares

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$494M
5Y Perf.+205.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.58B
5Y Perf.+123.5%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CWBC logoCWBC
ICE logoICE
NDAQ logoNDAQ
FIS logoFIS
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$494M$79.60B$50.58B$20.26B$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$194M$12.64B$8.27B$11.66B$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$38M$3.30B$1.91B$2.67B$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin72.5%61.9%54.8%37.6%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin27.1%38.7%29.5%17.9%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E11.9x17.3x22.6x6.2x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$143M$20.28B$9.93B$4.01B$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$119M$837M$814M$599M$10.27B$343.34B

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CWBC
ICE
NDAQ
FIS
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Community West Banc… (CWBC)100305.8+205.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)100223.5+123.5%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CWBC and FIS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. KO and ICE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CWBC
Community West Bancshares
The Banking Pick

CWBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 344.4%
  • NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • +40.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 6 stocks, NDAQ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs CWBC's 2.76
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs CWBC's 19.7%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs CWBC's 304.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWBC logoCWBC18.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CWBC's 19.7%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CWBC logoCWBC+40.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CWBCCommunity West Bancshares
FY 2025
Banking Operations
100.0%$196M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.
FY 2025
Market Services
51.4%$4.2B
Capital Access Platforms
26.1%$2.1B
Market Technology
22.6%$1.9B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGNDAQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1445.5x CWBC's $194M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWBC's 19.7%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$194M$12.6B$8.3B$11.7B$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$6.5B$3.1B$4.1B$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$3.3B$1.9B$2.7B$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$44M$4.3B$2.0B$2.8B$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.5%+61.9%+54.8%+37.6%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.1%+38.7%+29.5%+17.9%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.7%+26.1%+23.1%+22.9%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%+33.9%+24.2%+23.9%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+61.1%+23.1%+33.8%+30.6%+18.2%+16.0%
FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.9x trailing earnings, CWBC trades at a 75% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CWBC's 2.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$494M$79.6B$50.6B$20.3B$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$517M$99.0B$59.7B$23.7B$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.88x24.36x28.80x52.27x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.89x17.34x22.60x6.24x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.99x2.74x2.69x2.14x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.85x15.34x20.14x6.50x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.54x6.30x6.15x1.90x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x2.77x4.19x1.46x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.32x18.56x25.43x7.21x67.15x8.88x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for CWBC. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+11.6%+15.9%+18.4%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+2.3%+6.4%+7.5%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.0%+7.5%+8.1%+6.0%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.6%+9.5%+10.2%+6.6%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9899675
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.70x0.81x0.29x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M$19.4B$9.1B$3.4B$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$119M$837M$814M$599M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$143M$20.3B$9.9B$4.0B$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.06x6.53x14.11x21.16x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CWBC leads with a +40.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.9%-11.8%-7.3%-38.9%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.9%-20.4%+4.0%-49.4%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.6%+34.6%+80.8%-18.9%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+117.4%+30.9%+60.2%-67.3%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+304.9%+195.3%+344.3%-25.6%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.5%+10.4%+21.8%-6.8%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CWBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWBC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.78x0.35x0.71x0.61x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.80$189.35$101.79$82.74$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.98$136.67$77.09$37.91$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.8%+74.2%+87.4%+47.4%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.131.941.230.860.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded254K3.2M3.0M5.6M12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — CWBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CWBC as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.75$194.00$113.83$62.88$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts43636374861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+1.4%+1.2%+4.2%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0131415615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$1.93$1.04$1.63$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+1.7%+1.2%+7.0%+0.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CWBC vs ICE vs NDAQ vs FIS vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger pick with 18.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Community West Bancshares (CWBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Community West Bancshares (CWBC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the cheapest at 12.

9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Community West Bancshares's 2. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is pulling ahead at 18.

5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community West Bancshares grew EPS 344. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWBC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Community West Bancshares's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).

09

Is CWBC or ICE or NDAQ or FIS or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CWBC and ICE and NDAQ and FIS and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (CWBC (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and NDAQ (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CWBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.