Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $233M | $272M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105M | $120M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $25M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 70.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 27.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 9.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $115M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $132M | $343.34B |
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Financial Ser… (EFSI) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFSI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.61, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.09x
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
- PEG 0.74 vs JPM's 0.81
- 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs EFSI's -1.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs EFSI's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.74 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.1% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% |
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2681.6x EFSI's $105M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFSI's 7.9%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $105M | $120M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $35M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $25M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $16M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +70.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +27.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +20.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +13.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.4% | +20.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 59% valuation discount to EFSI's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $233M | $272M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $255M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 11.11x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.00x | 9.66x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.13x | 7.85x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 2.28x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.34x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 17.67x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for EFSI. EFSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +12.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +9.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.56x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | -$17M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $132M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $115M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 0.99x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,235 for EFSI. Over the past 12 months, EFSI leads with a +47.1% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs EFSI's 14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +14.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | +44.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +192.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.3% | +141.9% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +361.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +43.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EFSI and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUNC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.67x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $42.35 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.70 | $28.00 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +98.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.6 | 71.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 13K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
EFSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFSI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, EFSI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $25.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $0.92 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EFSI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
EFSI vs FUNC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFSI or FUNC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Eagle Financial Services, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +42. 3% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus EFSI's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Financial Services, Inc.
(EFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 54% more volatile than EFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -1. 3% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
6% net margin versus 7. 9% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 9. 5% for EFSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFSI or FUNC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFSI or FUNC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is EFSI or FUNC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFSI and FUNC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EFSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.