Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $233M | $2.52B | $355.61B | $207M | $979M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105M | $902M | $49.28B | $90M | $278M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $169M | $13.70B | $14M | $61M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 73.6% | 61.7% | 54.7% | 67.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 24.3% | 29.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.5x | 25.3x | 11.8x | 19.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $327M | $45.49B | $52M | $193M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $185M | $10.27B | $119M | $51M | $343.34B |
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Financial Ser… (EFSI) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.6%
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 5.31
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs EFSI's 7.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs EFSI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.8%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 26.5%
- +77.1% vs KO's +17.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- PEG 0.81 vs TRST's 5.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 5.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs EFSI's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs EFSI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.8% |
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • EFSI leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFSI's 7.9%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $105M | $902M | $49.3B | $90M | $278M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $241M | $15.5B | $9M | $90M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $169M | $13.7B | $14M | $61M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $225M | $12.6B | $11M | $46M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +73.6% | +61.7% | +54.7% | +67.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +24.3% | +29.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +18.8% | +27.8% | +16.0% | +22.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +24.9% | +25.5% | +12.4% | +16.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.4% | +39.5% | +18.2% | +63.0% | +44.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 47% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TRST's 4.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $233M | $2.5B | $355.6B | $207M | $979M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $2.7B | $390.8B | $140M | $1.1B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 14.47x | 27.18x | 14.70x | 17.00x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.00x | 11.54x | 25.27x | 11.79x | 19.25x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.06x | 2.43x | 2.90x | 4.69x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.13x | 11.03x | 26.39x | 15.69x | 12.49x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 2.90x | 7.42x | 2.29x | 3.52x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.29x | 10.40x | 1.11x | 1.47x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 11.49x | 67.15x | 19.90x | 21.39x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $4 for EFSI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +9.5% | +41.1% | +7.8% | +8.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.1% | +13.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.9% | +15.8% | +2.0% | +7.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +2.4% | +17.3% | +0.6% | +2.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.17x | 1.33x | 0.28x | 0.28x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $142M | $35.2B | -$67M | $142M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $185M | $10.3B | $119M | $51M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $327M | $45.5B | $52M | $193M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 1.05x | 10.70x | 0.16x | 0.90x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and TRST and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,235 for EFSI. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +77.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +17.6% | +20.3% | +24.3% | +35.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | +18.3% | +17.2% | +52.1% | +77.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +48.5% | +47.0% | +153.7% | +97.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.3% | +44.4% | +65.6% | +69.0% | +72.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +108.5% | +121.1% | +149.0% | +116.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +14.1% | +13.7% | +36.4% | +25.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.76x | -0.20x | 0.50x | 0.67x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $48.27 | $84.04 | $22.62 | $55.60 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.70 | $39.20 | $65.35 | $12.83 | $30.52 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +99.8% | +98.3% | +94.9% | +99.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.6 | 63.1 | 60.6 | 51.2 | 72.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 266K | 12.7M | 41K | 96K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFSI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $46.00 | $86.13 | — | — | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 | 48 | 2 | 3 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.0% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +2.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 13 | 56 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $1.43 | $2.04 | $0.37 | $1.51 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
EFSI vs NBTB vs KO vs CZWI vs TRST vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +42. 3% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 7. 9% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is EFSI or NBTB or KO or CZWI or TRST or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFSI and NBTB and KO and CZWI and TRST and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFSI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and CZWI (Financial Services) and TRST (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.