Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
DDOG logo
DDOG
FTNT logo
FTNT
CRWD logo
CRWD
ZS logo
ZS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82.47B
5Y Perf.+133.5%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$105.84B
5Y Perf.+48.6%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$167.70B
5Y Perf.+86.8%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.90B
5Y Perf.-34.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.35B
5Y Perf.+11.1%

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
DDOG logoDDOG
FTNT logoFTNT
CRWD logoCRWD
ZS logoZS
KO logoKO
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$85M$82.47B$105.84B$167.70B$20.90B$342.35B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$3.67B$7.11B$5.09B$3.17B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$136M$1.95B$-6M$-77M$13.70B
Gross Margin87.2%79.9%80.7%75.0%76.7%61.7%
Operating Margin18.7%-0.7%31.1%-3.9%-4.7%29.3%
Forward P/E20.8x95.6x45.4x133.7x31.4x24.3x
Total Debt$6M$1.54B$996M$820M$1.80B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$401M$2.50B$5.23B$2.39B$10.27B

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
DDOG
FTNT
CRWD
ZS
KO
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG)100233.5+133.5%
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT)100148.6+48.6%
CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD)100186.8+86.8%
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS)10065.1-34.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100111.1+11.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DDOG and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. FATN, FTNT, and ZS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Value Play

FATN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (20.8x vs 24.3x)
Best for: value
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
The Growth Leader

DDOG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.

  • 27.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • +91.2% vs ZS's -56.9%
Best for: growth and momentum
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FTNT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 19.6% 10Y total return vs CRWD's 10.4%
  • PEG 1.37 vs KO's 2.18
  • 19.4% ROA vs ZS's -1.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

CRWD doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
The Income Pick

ZS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
  • Rev growth 23.3%, EPS growth 30.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 99.9%, current ratio 2.01x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.01x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs ZS's -2.4%
  • 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDDOG logoDDOG27.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFATN logoFATNLower P/E (20.8x vs 24.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ZS's -2.4%
Stability / SafetyZS logoZSBeta 0.97 vs FATN's 2.17
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DDOG logoDDOG+91.2% vs ZS's -56.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FTNT logoFTNT19.4% ROA vs ZS's -1.2%

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Cybersecurity Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Cybersecurity Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
DDOGDatadog, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FTNTFortinet, Inc.
FY 2025
Security Subscription
38.7%$2.6B
Product
32.6%$2.2B
Technical Support and Other
28.6%$1.9B
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
FY 2026
Subscription And Circulation
94.9%$4.6B
Professional Services
5.1%$247M
ZSZscaler, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$2.7B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGZS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FATN and FTNT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 2565.8x FATN's $19M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZS's -2.4%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$3.7B$7.1B$5.1B$3.2B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$73M$2.5B$106M-$48M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$136M$2.0B-$6M-$77M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$1.1B$2.4B$1.5B$1.0B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+79.9%+80.7%+75.0%+76.7%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%-0.7%+31.1%-3.9%-4.7%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+3.7%+27.5%-0.1%-2.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%+29.4%+34.3%+28.5%+32.2%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%+32.2%+20.1%+25.6%+25.4%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+120.9%+28.6%+125.0%-2.4%+18.2%
Evenly matched — FATN and FTNT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.4x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 772.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTNT offers better value at 1.77x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$85M$82.5B$105.8B$167.7B$20.9B$342.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86M$83.6B$104.3B$163.3B$20.3B$377.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.40x772.27x58.86x-1013.52x-478.70x26.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x95.56x45.41x133.71x31.38x24.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.77x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.70x1069.69x46.71x25.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.45x24.06x15.57x34.85x7.82x7.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.38x22.56x86.46x38.02x11.09x10.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.42x47.55x128.00x28.76x64.64x
FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FTNT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FTNT delivers a 155.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $156 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ZS. CRWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTNT scores 7/9 vs ZS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+3.8%+155.7%-0.1%-3.7%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%+2.1%+19.4%-0.1%-1.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%-0.8%-3.5%-8.4%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%-1.0%+37.7%-4.8%-4.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9467447
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.41x0.81x0.18x1.00x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351$1.1B-$1.5B-$4.4B-$592M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$401M$2.5B$5.2B$2.4B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.5B$996M$820M$1.8B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x4.46x121.54x1.07x-2.93x10.70x
FTNT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FTNT and CRWD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FTNT five years ago would be worth $31,458 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,640 for ZS. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +91.2% total return vs ZS's -56.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWD at 63.3% vs ZS's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+183.3%+73.2%+83.7%+45.2%-41.4%+15.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.3%+91.2%+40.1%+41.9%-56.9%+13.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+141.3%+107.3%+335.4%-13.2%+41.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.5%+214.6%+206.2%-33.6%+59.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+517.0%+1955.2%+1035.8%+291.7%+112.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+34.1%+27.5%+63.3%-4.6%+12.3%
Evenly matched — FTNT and CRWD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ZS's 38.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.32x1.03x1.42x0.97x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$278.70$150.05$785.66$336.99$82.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$98.01$70.12$342.72$114.63$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+83.1%+95.3%+83.9%+38.4%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.461.173.058.342.051.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M5.8M5.8M3.3M4.4M12.5M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", FTNT as "Hold", CRWD as "Buy", ZS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for ZS (target: $200) vs -32.2% for FTNT (target: $97). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.FTNT logoFTNTFortinet, Inc.CRWD logoCRWDCrowdStrike Holdi…ZS logoZSZscaler, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$209.58$97.05$682.62$199.77$86.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts14768665348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.2%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). FATN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs DDOG vs FTNT vs CRWD vs ZS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Datadog, Inc. at 772. 3x. On forward P/E, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 20. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortinet, Inc. wins at 1. 37x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Fortinet, Inc.

(FTNT) delivered a total return of +214. 6%, compared to -33. 6% for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTNT returned +1955% versus KO's +112. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately -1568% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -725. 9% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZS leads at 34. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -3. 4% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTNT leads at 30. 6% versus -6. 1% for CRWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTNT leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 37x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 133. 7x for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — 112. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZS: 54. 6% to $199. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. FATN, DDOG, FTNT, CRWD, ZS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FATN or DDOG or FTNT or CRWD or ZS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FATN and DDOG and FTNT and CRWD and ZS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and DDOG (Technology) and FTNT (Technology) and CRWD (Technology) and ZS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FTNT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRWD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ZS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while FATN, DDOG, FTNT, CRWD, ZS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.