Software - Infrastructure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
Banks - Diversified
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Telecommunications Services | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $85M | $1.14B | $2.91B | $489.33B | $82.47B | $869.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $41.45B | $859M | $60.75B | $3.67B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-1.50B | $96M | $11.96B | $136M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 38.6% | 78.1% | 64.3% | 79.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 5.2% | 12.8% | 23.4% | -0.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — | 16.8x | 29.0x | 95.6x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $39.51B | $40M | $28.09B | $1.54B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $5.00B | $586M | $8.35B | $401M | $343.34B |
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 368.9 | +268.9% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 193.5 | +93.5% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 201.2 | +101.2% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 233.5 | +133.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FATN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 133.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- 25.9% margin vs SIFY's -3.6%
- 15.2% ROA vs SIFY's -3.6%, ROIC 11.9% vs 3.3%
SIFY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +229.0% vs FATN's -24.3%
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.85x
- PEG 0.44 vs JPM's 1.07
CSCO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 433.9%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 95.6x)
- Beta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 95.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs SIFY's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +229.0% vs FATN's -24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SIFY's -3.6%, ROIC 11.9% vs 3.3% |
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FATN leads in 1 of 6 categories
NTCT leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SIFY leads 0 • CSCO leads 0 • DDOG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FATN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14594.4x FATN's $19M. FATN is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIFY's -3.6%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $41.4B | $859M | $60.7B | $3.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $8.6B | $169M | $16.5B | $73M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$1.5B | $96M | $12.0B | $136M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$788,908 | $0 | $285M | $12.6B | $1.1B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +38.6% | +78.1% | +64.3% | +79.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +5.2% | +12.8% | +23.4% | -0.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | -3.6% | +11.1% | +19.7% | +3.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -9.2% | +33.2% | +20.8% | +29.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.5% | +2.5% | -1.0% | +12.0% | +32.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.7% | 0.0% | +37.1% | +120.9% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 772.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTCT offers better value at 0.82x vs JPM's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $1.1B | $2.9B | $489.3B | $82.5B | $869.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $1.5B | $2.4B | $509.1B | $83.6B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.40x | -139.07x | 31.28x | 48.69x | 772.27x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — | 16.85x | 29.04x | 95.56x | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.82x | — | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.70x | 18.24x | 14.03x | 34.82x | 1069.69x | 18.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 2.74x | 3.38x | 8.64x | 24.06x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.38x | 5.43x | 1.77x | 10.60x | 22.56x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.18x | 36.82x | 82.42x | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FATN and NTCT and CSCO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SIFY. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | -7.5% | +6.0% | +25.1% | +3.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.2% | -3.6% | +4.2% | +9.7% | +2.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | +3.3% | +7.3% | +13.0% | -0.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +4.4% | +6.1% | +13.7% | -1.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 1.96x | 0.02x | 0.60x | 0.41x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493,351 | $34.5B | -$547M | $19.7B | $1.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $5.0B | $586M | $8.3B | $401M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $39.5B | $40M | $28.1B | $1.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 0.90x | 67.81x | 10.61x | 4.46x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CSCO and DDOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $25,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,434 for SIFY. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +229.0% total return vs FATN's -24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 37.4% vs NTCT's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +183.3% | +28.5% | +51.4% | +64.4% | +73.2% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | +229.0% | +70.3% | +90.9% | +91.2% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +85.3% | +34.9% | +159.6% | +141.3% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -25.7% | +33.4% | +143.9% | +150.5% | +102.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +138.4% | +64.2% | +375.2% | +517.0% | +433.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +22.8% | +10.5% | +37.4% | +34.1% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSCO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.78x | 1.07x | 1.04x | 1.32x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $17.85 | $43.80 | $130.37 | $278.70 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $4.15 | $20.39 | $63.87 | $98.01 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +88.5% | +92.8% | +95.2% | +83.1% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 41.1 | 56.3 | 63.0 | 61.1 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 69K | 549K | 21.7M | 5.8M | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy", NTCT as "Hold", CSCO as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for JPM (target: $339) vs -9.5% for DDOG (target: $210). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.91% vs CSCO's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $38.00 | $122.30 | $209.58 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 | 21 | 73 | 47 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +1.3% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 15 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 | — | $1.61 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
FATN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FATN vs SIFY vs NTCT vs CSCO vs DDOG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Datadog, Inc. at 772. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NetScout Systems, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +150. 5%, compared to -25. 7% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DDOG returned +517. 0% versus NTCT's +64. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately 129% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -520. 9% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
FatPipe, Inc.
Common Stock (FATN) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus -2. 0% for Sify Technologies Limited — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDOG leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 95. 6x for Datadog, Inc. — 81. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 8. 9% to $338. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), CSCO (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FATN, SIFY, NTCT, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FATN or SIFY or NTCT or CSCO or DDOG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +433. 9% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FATN and SIFY and NTCT and CSCO and DDOG and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and NTCT (Technology) and CSCO (Technology) and DDOG (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CSCO, JPM pay a dividend while FATN, SIFY, NTCT, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.