Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $37M | $523M | $3.10T | $2.65T | $4.46T | $342.09B | $842.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $436M | $318.27B | $742.78B | $422.57B | $49.28B | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $262K | $-32M | $125.22B | $90.80B | $160.21B | $13.70B | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 54.8% | 55.2% | 68.3% | 50.6% | 60.4% | 61.7% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | -89.5% | 1.7% | 46.8% | 11.5% | 32.7% | 29.3% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 28.0x | 25.9x | 24.3x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $287M | $112.18B | $152.99B | $59.29B | $45.49B | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $49M | $30.24B | $86.81B | $30.71B | $10.27B | $469.32B |
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 202.3 | +102.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
- 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MSFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs AIOT's -7.4%
- Beta 0.86 vs AIOT's 2.69, lower leverage
Among these 7 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 9.1% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.5%
- PEG 0.87 vs KO's 2.18
- PEG 0.87 vs 2.18
- +119.6% vs FUSE's -89.1%
- 27.4% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -4.3%
KO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
In this particular matchup, JPM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6% | |
| Value | PEG 0.87 vs 2.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs AIOT's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs AIOT's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +119.6% vs FUSE's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -4.3% |
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 1 • KO leads 1 • FUSE leads 0 • AIOT leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 77429.0x FUSE's $10M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIOT's -7.4%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $436M | $318.3B | $742.8B | $422.6B | $49.3B | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $69M | $192.6B | $155.9B | $161.3B | $15.5B | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $261,897 | -$32M | $125.2B | $90.8B | $160.2B | $13.7B | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $3M | $72.9B | -$2.5B | $73.3B | $12.6B | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.8% | +55.2% | +68.3% | +50.6% | +60.4% | +61.7% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | +1.7% | +46.8% | +11.5% | +32.7% | +29.3% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -7.4% | +39.3% | +12.2% | +37.9% | +27.8% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -82.3% | +0.6% | +22.9% | -0.3% | +17.3% | +25.5% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +47.4% | +18.3% | +16.6% | +21.8% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.5% | +23.4% | +74.8% | +81.9% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AIOT and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 54% valuation discount to AMZN's 34.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.14x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $523M | $3.10T | $2.65T | $4.46T | $342.1B | $842.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $761M | $3.18T | $2.71T | $4.49T | $377.3B | $1.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.90x | -8.93x | 30.55x | 34.31x | 34.09x | 26.14x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.80x | 27.98x | 25.94x | 24.31x | 14.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.62x | 1.23x | 1.14x | 2.34x | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.93x | 19.53x | 18.61x | 29.85x | 25.47x | 13.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.80x | 1.44x | 10.99x | 3.69x | 11.06x | 7.14x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.03x | 9.06x | 6.48x | 10.85x | 10.00x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 43.22x | 343.84x | 60.85x | 64.59x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AIOT. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs FUSE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.6% | +33.1% | +23.3% | +39.0% | +41.1% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -3.4% | +19.2% | +11.5% | +27.4% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -4.3% | +24.9% | +14.7% | +25.1% | +15.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -5.1% | +29.7% | +15.3% | +30.3% | +17.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x | 0.33x | 0.37x | 0.14x | 1.33x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $238M | $81.9B | $66.2B | $28.6B | $35.2B | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $49M | $30.2B | $86.8B | $30.7B | $10.3B | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $287M | $112.2B | $153.0B | $59.3B | $45.5B | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | 0.47x | 55.65x | 39.96x | 392.15x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $30,817 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,314 for FUSE. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +119.6% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 43.2% vs FUSE's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | -26.9% | -11.5% | +8.6% | +17.0% | +15.8% | -3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -16.7% | -10.1% | +18.3% | +119.6% | +15.0% | +21.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -19.5% | +26.9% | +96.4% | +193.8% | +40.5% | +135.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% | +70.0% | +53.9% | +208.2% | +58.5% | +102.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -19.5% | +745.5% | +577.0% | +914.2% | +112.9% | +435.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.4% | -7.0% | +8.3% | +25.2% | +43.2% | +12.0% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 2.69x | 0.86x | 1.45x | 1.33x | -0.15x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.00 | $5.88 | $555.45 | $278.56 | $408.61 | $82.66 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $2.77 | $356.28 | $197.28 | $162.00 | $65.35 | $260.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +65.3% | +75.0% | +88.3% | +90.2% | +96.1% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 73.9 | 52.9 | 43.6 | 48.8 | 37.7 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.5M | 33.6M | 43.4M | 27.4M | 12.7M | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIOT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIOT as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 8.5% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 19.62% vs GOOGL's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $551.96 | $307.29 | $411.80 | $86.29 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 82 | 94 | 83 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +19.6% | +0.8% | — | +0.2% | +2.6% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 21 | — | 2 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $3.23 | — | $0.82 | $2.04 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.2% | +3.4% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MSFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FUSE vs AIOT vs MSFT vs AMZN vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 34. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +208. 2%, compared to -86. 9% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +914. 2% versus FUSE's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning AIOT is approximately -1917% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc. grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -77. 2% for FUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 108. 3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, AIOT (19.
6% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 6% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FUSE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUSE or AIOT or MSFT or AMZN or GOOGL or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, FUSE: -86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUSE and AIOT and MSFT and AMZN and GOOGL and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and AIOT (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. AIOT, MSFT, KO, JPM pay a dividend while FUSE, AMZN, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.