Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $61M | $37.74B | $1.36B | $2.98B | $245M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.29B | $66M | $132M | $39M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $577M | $-395M | $-65M | $-109M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | -29.1% | 80.9% | -31.9% | -64.2% | 98.8% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -60.6% | 17.5% | -6.4% | -281.0% | -297.5% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.7x | — | — | — | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $1.28B | $93M | $294M | $77M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $1.66B | $155M | $295M | $147M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImageneBio Inc (IMA) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 200.3 | +100.3% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 15.1 | -84.9% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 36.3 | -63.7% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 210.7 | +110.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 156.7 | +56.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 7.5%, current ratio 12.49x
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 12.49x
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- Beta 0.60 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage
NTLA doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
BEAM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 120.0% revenue growth vs IMA's -77.1%
- +66.5% vs IMA's -67.0%
In this particular matchup, EDIT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 27.8% margin vs IMA's -56.7%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs EDIT's -58.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs IMA's -77.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs IMA's -56.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs EDIT's 2.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs IMA's -67.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs EDIT's -58.2% |
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • IMA leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALNY and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMA operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMA's -56.7%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B | $66M | $132M | $39M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$53M | $677M | -$411M | -$355M | -$111M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | $577M | -$395M | -$65M | -$109M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $641M | -$364M | -$384M | -$141M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -29.1% | +80.9% | -31.9% | -64.2% | +98.8% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -60.6% | +17.5% | -6.4% | -2.8% | -3.0% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.7% | +13.5% | -6.0% | -49.2% | -2.8% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -59.8% | +15.0% | -5.5% | -2.9% | -3.6% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +96.4% | -9.5% | -100.0% | -39.2% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | +4.4% | +26.4% | +26.6% | +71.7% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $37.7B | $1.4B | $3.0B | $245M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $37.4B | $1.3B | $3.0B | $175M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.50x | 121.39x | -3.18x | -35.84x | -1.39x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.74x | — | — | — | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 67.05x | — | — | — | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 76.54x | 10.16x | 20.08x | 21.34x | 6.04x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 48.27x | 1.95x | 2.32x | 8.13x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.09x | — | — | — | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-7 for EDIT. IMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 2.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.2% | +98.3% | -57.3% | -5.9% | -6.8% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +11.8% | -46.1% | -4.6% | -58.2% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.9% | +33.4% | -44.0% | -31.1% | — | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.6% | +15.3% | -48.5% | -33.3% | -49.1% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.62x | 0.14x | 0.24x | 2.81x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$379M | -$62M | -$1M | -$70M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $1.7B | $155M | $295M | $147M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $1.3B | $93M | $294M | $77M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -560.22x | 2.02x | — | 1.08x | -91.80x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $330 for IMA. Over the past 12 months, BEAM leads with a +66.5% total return vs IMA's -67.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs IMA's -59.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.7% | -29.3% | +31.5% | +7.0% | +22.0% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.0% | -7.2% | +45.0% | +66.5% | +14.7% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | +46.5% | -72.2% | -12.0% | -74.8% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.7% | +69.7% | -86.2% | -68.4% | -93.5% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +366.4% | -54.5% | +54.8% | -91.7% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.4% | +13.6% | -34.8% | -4.2% | -36.9% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs IMA's 30.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.60x | 2.28x | 2.18x | 2.52x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.00 | $495.55 | $28.25 | $36.44 | $4.54 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.36 | $281.76 | $7.95 | $15.60 | $1.66 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.2% | +57.1% | +42.9% | +79.7% | +55.1% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 44.0 | 43.4 | 48.4 | 39.0 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 432K | 1.0M | 6.3M | 1.9M | 2.1M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALNY as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.1% upside for NTLA (target: $26) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $445.67 | $26.29 | $48.00 | $5.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 | 39 | 27 | 25 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMA vs ALNY vs NTLA vs BEAM vs EDIT vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -77. 1% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -96. 7% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus IMA's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately -1361% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ImageneBio Inc (IMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 3% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -77. 1% for ImageneBio Inc (IMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -954. 9% for ImageneBio Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -56. 7% for ImageneBio Inc — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -60. 6% for IMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDIT leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 117. 1% to $26. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IMA, ALNY, NTLA, BEAM, EDIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMA or ALNY or NTLA or BEAM or EDIT or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, EDIT: -91. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMA and ALNY and NTLA and BEAM and EDIT and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMA (Healthcare) and ALNY (Healthcare) and NTLA (Healthcare) and BEAM (Healthcare) and EDIT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while IMA, ALNY, NTLA, BEAM, EDIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.