Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LSBK logo
LSBK
ICE logo
ICE
FIS logo
FIS
CME logo
CME
JKHY logo
JKHY
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.+92.3%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$75.83B
5Y Perf.+46.2%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.75B
5Y Perf.-71.5%
CME
CME Group Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$89.39B
5Y Perf.+51.6%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.-31.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LSBK logoLSBK
ICE logoICE
FIS logoFIS
CME logoCME
JKHY logoJKHY
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesInformation Technology ServicesBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$137M$75.83B$19.75B$89.39B$9.14B$908.57B$341.71B
Revenue (TTM)$40M$12.64B$11.66B$6.76B$2.52B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$3.30B$2.67B$4.24B$519M$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin70.9%61.9%37.6%86.3%44.1%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin22.1%38.7%17.9%65.6%26.0%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E18.1x16.5x6.1x20.1x18.4x14.6x24.3x
Total Debt$1M$20.28B$4.01B$3.76B$0.00$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$64M$837M$599M$4.42B$102M$343.34B$10.27B

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LSBK
ICE
FIS
CME
JKHY
JPM
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Lake Shore Bancorp,… (LSBK)100192.3+92.3%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100146.2+46.2%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10028.5-71.5%
CME Group Inc. (CME)100151.6+51.6%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10068.6-31.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CME and JKHY are tied at the top with 2 categories each (7-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LSBK, ICE, and FIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

LSBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 200.88x
  • NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +53.1% vs FIS's -50.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.25 vs KO's 2.17
  • Lower P/E (6.1x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.25 vs 2.17
Best for: valuation efficiency
CME
CME Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

CME has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.

  • 62.8% margin vs LSBK's 18.4%
  • 4.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Best for: quality and dividends
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Beta 0.16, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
  • Beta 0.16 vs JPM's 0.87
  • 17.0% ROA vs LSBK's 1.0%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs CME's 242.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Angle

In this particular matchup, KO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICE logoICE7.5% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.1x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.25 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsCME logoCME62.8% margin vs LSBK's 18.4%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.16 vs JPM's 0.87
DividendsCME logoCME4.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)LSBK logoLSBK+53.1% vs FIS's -50.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs LSBK's 1.0%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.4%

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
LSBKLake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
CMECME Group Inc.
FY 2025
clearing and transaction fees
81.0%$5.3B
MarketData
12.3%$803M
OtherRevenue
6.7%$436M
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGKO

Who Leads Where

CME leads in 1 of 6 categories

FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • LSBK leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
0leads
ICEIntercontinental Exch…
0leads
LSBKLake Shore Bancorp, I…
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
JKHYJack Henry & Associat…
1leads
CMECME Group Inc.
1leads
FISFidelity National Inf…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 7087.3x LSBK's $40M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSBK's 18.4%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$12.6B$11.7B$6.8B$2.5B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$6.5B$4.1B$4.7B$810M$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$3.3B$2.7B$4.2B$519M$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M$4.3B$2.8B$4.4B$728M$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.9%+61.9%+37.6%+86.3%+44.1%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.1%+38.7%+17.9%+65.6%+26.0%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+26.1%+22.9%+62.8%+20.6%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.8%+33.9%+23.9%+64.4%+28.9%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+8.7%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.8%+23.1%+30.6%+21.4%+12.5%+16.0%+18.2%
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 68% valuation discount to FIS's 50.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs ICE's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$137M$75.8B$19.7B$89.4B$9.1B$908.6B$341.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$74M$95.3B$23.2B$88.7B$9.0B$1.51T$376.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.13x23.20x50.95x22.08x20.23x16.22x26.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.52x6.09x20.09x18.43x14.60x24.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.59x2.61x2.09x1.61x2.01x0.92x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.02x14.76x6.36x19.70x11.68x18.52x25.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.46x6.00x1.85x13.71x3.85x3.25x7.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x2.64x1.43x3.09x4.33x2.51x9.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.40x17.68x7.03x21.32x15.53x9.01x64.52x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for LSBK. LSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+11.6%+18.4%+15.3%+24.0%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+2.3%+7.5%+2.2%+17.0%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+7.5%+6.0%+10.2%+21.0%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+9.5%+6.6%+3.6%+22.7%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98965657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.70x0.29x0.13x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$63M$19.4B$3.4B-$666M-$102M$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$64M$837M$599M$4.4B$102M$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$20.3B$4.0B$3.8B$0$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.75x6.53x21.16x41.55x122.37x0.74x10.70x
JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,259 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, LSBK leads with a +53.1% total return vs FIS's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs FIS's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.7%-15.7%-40.4%-5.4%-28.5%+0.8%+16.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+53.1%-24.4%-50.4%-5.3%-29.1%+20.9%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.3%+24.3%-21.0%+52.2%-18.8%+138.8%+39.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+67.1%+26.4%-67.4%+39.4%-16.8%+135.5%+65.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.6%+192.5%-26.7%+242.5%+72.7%+481.2%+115.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+7.5%-7.6%+15.0%-6.7%+33.7%+11.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LSBK and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSBK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.27x0.38x0.57x-0.26x0.15x0.87x-0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.40$189.35$82.74$329.16$193.39$338.09$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.63$132.84$37.85$244.56$122.87$269.72$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+100.0%+70.7%+46.2%+74.9%+65.3%+96.2%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.129.635.235.730.872.149.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K3.3M5.7M2.8M1.3M7.4M13.6M
Evenly matched — LSBK and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", CME as "Hold", JKHY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, CME offers the higher dividend yield at 4.43% vs LSBK's 0.79%.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CME logoCMECME Group Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$194.00$62.88$320.67$193.75$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts363736226148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+1.4%+4.3%+4.4%+1.8%+1.8%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013115221556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14$1.93$1.63$10.92$2.25$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+1.8%+7.2%+0.3%+0.4%+3.8%+0.2%
Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CME leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LSBK vs ICE vs FIS vs CME vs JKHY vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -67. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus FIS's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -437% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 47. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 64. 6% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK).

09

Is LSBK or ICE or FIS or CME or JKHY or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 4% yield, +242. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +242. 5%, FIS: -26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LSBK and ICE and FIS and CME and JKHY and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (LSBK (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and CME (Financial Services) and JKHY (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.