Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $4.55B | $2.39B | $12.11B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $634M | $669M | $1.06B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-27M | $-609M | $-327M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 87.9% | 83.6% | 98.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 5.2% | -83.9% | -33.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x | — | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $483M | $1.28B | $2.61B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $214M | $434M | $372M | $10.27B |
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 150.9 | +50.9% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 130.2 | +30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FOLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- +134.8% vs RARE's -38.0%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IONS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.42
- 241.3% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 3.83x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 27.8% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs -89.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs RARE's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.8% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs -89.4% |
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
IONS leads 1 • MAZE leads 0 • FOLD leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 2464.2x MAZE's $20M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAZE's -6.1%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $634M | $669M | $1.1B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $40M | -$536M | $4.5B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$27M | -$609M | -$327M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $30M | -$487M | -$971M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +87.9% | +83.6% | +98.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +5.2% | -83.9% | -33.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -4.3% | -91.0% | -30.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +4.7% | -72.8% | -91.8% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.7% | -2.4% | +87.0% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -89.0% | -17.2% | +39.8% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KO's 26.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.5B | $2.4B | $12.1B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $4.8B | $3.2B | $14.4B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.89x | -164.85x | -4.18x | -30.79x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x | — | — | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x | — | — | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.17x | 3.56x | 12.83x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 16.29x | — | 23.97x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x | — | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | -12.0% | -6.1% | -58.6% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | -3.2% | -45.8% | -10.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | +5.3% | -89.4% | -12.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | +5.1% | -46.4% | -14.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.76x | — | 5.35x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | $269M | $842M | $2.2B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $214M | $434M | $372M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $483M | $1.3B | $2.6B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | 1.00x | -14.49x | -3.64x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,367 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +134.8% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs RARE's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | +1.5% | +3.2% | -8.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.5% | +134.8% | -38.0% | +105.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +11.6% | -52.6% | +76.0% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +35.2% | -76.3% | +93.9% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +147.3% | -59.4% | +241.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +3.7% | -22.0% | +20.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOLD and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.48x | 1.43x | 0.42x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $14.50 | $42.37 | $86.74 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $5.51 | $18.29 | $34.78 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +99.9% | +57.5% | +84.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 72.2 | 53.2 | 46.2 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 642K | 2.3M | 1.5M | 1.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.0% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $14.50 | $48.36 | $107.27 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 | 33 | 32 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IONS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25.
3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -76. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning RARE is approximately -816% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOLD leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.
3x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 163. 0% to $63. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MAZE, FOLD, RARE, IONS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAZE and FOLD and RARE and IONS and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAZE (Healthcare) and FOLD (Healthcare) and RARE (Healthcare) and IONS (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while MAZE, FOLD, RARE, IONS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.