Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $524M | $1.77B | $2.52B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $527M | $489M | $730M | $902M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $71M | $19M | $111M | $169M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 46.2% | 56.1% | 73.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.3% | 7.1% | 21.5% | 24.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 11.0x | 11.9x | 11.5x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $81M | $592M | $371M | $327M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $394M | $126M | $2.35B | $185M | $10.27B |
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Bank H… (MCB) | 100 | 301.2 | +201.2% |
| Flushing Financial … (FFIC) | 100 | 138.6 | +38.6% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 1.28 vs KO's 2.26
- NIM 3.7% vs FFIC's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.28 vs 2.26
FFIC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.7% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
DCOM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- +50.3% vs KO's +17.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76 vs FFIC's 1.01, lower leverage
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs FFIC's 3.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs FFIC's 0.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.28 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FFIC's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs FFIC's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.3% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs FFIC's 0.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.7% |
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FFIC leads 1 • MCB leads 1 • DCOM leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 100.7x FFIC's $489M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 3.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $527M | $489M | $730M | $902M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $95M | $40M | $161M | $241M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $71M | $19M | $111M | $169M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $56M | $182M | $225M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +46.2% | +56.1% | +73.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +7.1% | +21.5% | +24.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +3.9% | +15.2% | +18.8% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +11.4% | +25.0% | +24.9% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.3% | +107.5% | +2.3% | +39.5% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FFIC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 49% valuation discount to FFIC's 28.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCB offers better value at 2.01x vs DCOM's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $524M | $1.8B | $2.5B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $694M | $990M | -$218M | $2.7B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.60x | 28.65x | 16.91x | 14.47x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.29x | 10.97x | 11.89x | 11.54x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.01x | — | 2.65x | 2.06x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.84x | 24.85x | -1.39x | 11.03x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 1.16x | 2.42x | 2.90x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.75x | 1.17x | 1.29x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.21x | 9.39x | 9.68x | 11.49x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. MCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIC scores 8/9 vs MCB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +2.7% | +7.7% | +9.5% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.2% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +1.7% | +5.6% | +7.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +0.7% | +6.1% | +2.4% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.84x | 0.25x | 0.17x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$362M | $466M | -$2.0B | $142M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $394M | $126M | $2.4B | $185M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $81M | $592M | $371M | $327M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.14x | 0.57x | 1.05x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,047 for FFIC. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +50.3% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCB at 39.8% vs FFIC's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | +5.1% | +35.9% | +17.6% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.6% | +34.9% | +50.3% | +18.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.2% | +25.0% | +133.2% | +48.5% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | -9.5% | +31.8% | +44.4% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.7% | +16.6% | +77.9% | +108.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +7.7% | +32.6% | +14.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 87.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.01x | 0.95x | 0.76x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.84 | $17.79 | $40.53 | $48.27 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.81 | $11.13 | $25.63 | $39.20 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +87.0% | +98.9% | +99.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 42.7 | 69.9 | 63.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 126K | 262K | 272K | 266K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCB as "Buy", FFIC as "Hold", DCOM as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for FFIC (target: $17) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.68% vs MCB's 0.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $97.00 | $16.75 | $39.50 | $46.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +5.7% | +2.5% | +3.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $0.88 | $1.00 | $1.43 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FFIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MCB vs FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 28. 6x. On forward P/E, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. wins at 1. 28x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -9. 5% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCB returned +161. 7% versus FFIC's +16. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning FFIC is approximately -605% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIC: 8. 3% to $16. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 0. 3% for Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB).
09Is MCB or FFIC or DCOM or NBTB or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MCB: +161. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCB and FFIC and DCOM and NBTB and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MCB (Financial Services) and FFIC (Financial Services) and DCOM (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FFIC, DCOM, NBTB, KO pay a dividend while MCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.