Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
PFIS logo
PFIS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs PFIS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$636M
5Y Perf.+66.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

MPB vs PFIS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
PFIS logoPFIS
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$868M$636M$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$281M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$59M$13.70B
Gross Margin63.6%66.7%61.7%
Operating Margin20.5%25.7%29.3%
Forward P/E10.8x9.8x25.3x
Total Debt$59M$258M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$58M$10.27B

MPB vs PFIS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
PFIS
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
Peoples Financial S… (PFIS)100166.3+66.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs PFIS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFIS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇PFIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 164.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • NIM 3.2% vs PFIS's 3.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 49.7%, current ratio 8.76x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFIS logoPFIS22.3% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValuePFIS logoPFISLower P/E (9.8x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.23 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
Stability / SafetyPFIS logoPFISBeta 0.68 vs MPB's 0.72
DividendsPFIS logoPFIS3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)PFIS logoPFIS+34.3% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%

MPB vs PFIS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
67.6%$14M
Asset Management
14.7%$3M
Commission And Fees On Fiduciary Activities
11.3%$2M
Credit Card
6.4%$1M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

MPB vs PFIS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFISLAGGINGMPB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 175.2x PFIS's $281M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$281M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$80M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$59M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$43M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+66.7%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+25.7%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+21.0%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+15.4%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+95.1%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFIS offers better value at 1.35x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$868M$636M$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$836M$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x10.80x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x9.83x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.57x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x2.26x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.23x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x14.66x67.15x
PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PFIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+11.8%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+2.4%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.50x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$200M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$58M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$258M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x0.77x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PFIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $16,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, PFIS leads with a +34.3% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFIS at 18.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+34.4%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+34.3%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%+66.1%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%+67.6%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+118.8%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+18.4%+13.7%
PFIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPB's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.68x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$63.91$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$43.64$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+99.4%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.965.760.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K58K12.7M
Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", PFIS as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -11.8% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MPB's 2.29%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$56.00$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts2148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1956
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$2.45$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFIS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallPeoples Financial Services … (PFIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs PFIS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or PFIS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or PFIS or KO?

On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Financial Services Corp. wins at 1. 23x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or PFIS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) delivered a total return of +67. 6%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus PFIS's +118. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or PFIS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning MPB is approximately -460% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or PFIS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or PFIS or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 17. 2% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 22. 1% for MPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFIS leads at 66. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or PFIS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 23x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or PFIS or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 3% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB).

09

Is MPB or PFIS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MPB: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and PFIS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.