Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
PFIS logo
PFIS
KO logo
KO
NBTB logo
NBTB
FULT logo
FULT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$636M
5Y Perf.+66.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
PFIS logoPFIS
KO logoKO
NBTB logoNBTB
FULT logoFULT
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$868M$636M$355.61B$2.52B$4.50B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$281M$49.28B$902M$1.89B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$59M$13.70B$169M$392M
Gross Margin63.6%66.7%61.7%73.6%67.4%
Operating Margin20.5%25.7%29.3%24.3%25.7%
Forward P/E10.8x9.8x25.3x11.5x11.5x
Total Debt$59M$258M$45.49B$327M$1.30B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$58M$10.27B$185M$271M

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
PFIS
KO
NBTB
FULT
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
Peoples Financial S… (PFIS)100166.3+66.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FULT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇PFIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
Best for: bank quality
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 49.7%, current ratio 8.76x
  • Beta 0.68, yield 3.9%, current ratio 8.76x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 121.1% 10Y total return vs PFIS's 118.8%
  • 27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.82 vs KO's 2.26
  • +37.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFIS logoPFIS22.3% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValuePFIS logoPFISLower P/E (9.8x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.23 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
Stability / SafetyPFIS logoPFISBeta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.99
DividendsPFIS logoPFIS3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)FULT logoFULT+37.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
67.6%$14M
Asset Management
14.7%$3M
Commission And Fees On Fiduciary Activities
11.3%$2M
Credit Card
6.4%$1M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 175.2x PFIS's $281M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$281M$49.3B$902M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$80M$15.5B$241M$529M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$59M$13.7B$169M$392M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$43M$12.6B$225M$267M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+66.7%+61.7%+73.6%+67.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+25.7%+29.3%+24.3%+25.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+21.0%+27.8%+18.8%+20.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+15.4%+25.5%+24.9%+14.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+95.1%+18.2%+39.5%+47.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
Market CapShares × price$868M$636M$355.6B$2.5B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$836M$390.8B$2.7B$5.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x10.80x27.18x14.47x11.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x9.83x25.27x11.54x11.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x2.43x2.06x0.80x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.57x26.39x11.03x10.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x2.26x7.42x2.90x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.23x10.40x1.29x1.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x14.66x67.15x11.49x15.81x
PFIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+11.8%+41.1%+9.5%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.2%+13.1%+1.1%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.7%+15.8%+7.9%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+2.4%+17.3%+2.4%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.50x1.33x0.17x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$200M$35.2B$142M$1.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$58M$10.3B$185M$271M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$258M$45.5B$327M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x0.77x10.70x1.05x0.84x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $16,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 25.1% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+34.4%+20.3%+17.6%+21.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+34.3%+17.2%+18.3%+37.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%+66.1%+47.0%+48.5%+96.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%+67.6%+65.6%+44.4%+61.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+118.8%+121.1%+108.5%+114.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+18.4%+13.7%+14.1%+25.1%
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KO and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.68x-0.20x0.76x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$63.91$84.04$48.27$23.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$43.64$65.35$39.20$16.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+99.4%+98.3%+99.8%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.965.760.663.168.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K58K12.7M266K1.7M
Evenly matched — KO and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", PFIS as "Hold", KO as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -11.8% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MPB's 2.29%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$56.00$86.13$46.00$23.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts21481020
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.9%+2.5%+3.0%+3.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1956135
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$2.45$2.04$1.43$0.77
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%+0.2%+0.4%+1.5%
Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) delivered a total return of +67. 6%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately -593% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 17. 2% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 22. 1% for MPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 3% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB).

09

Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and PFIS and KO and NBTB and FULT?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.