Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Banks - Diversified
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $146M | $31M | $5.14B | $142.62B | $14.38B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $143M | $6.52B | $53.69B | $6.29B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-76M | $2.86B | $8.54B | $59M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 37.1% | 43.2% | 41.0% | 41.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -101.9% | -51.0% | -2.5% | 11.7% | 0.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.1x | 20.7x | 122.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $40M | $1.28B | $13.47B | $1.93B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $27M | $1.13B | $7.74B | $1.60B | $343.34B |
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marti Technologies,… (MRT) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) | 100 | 33.3 | -66.7% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
- 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
- Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
BIRD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LYFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
- 39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7%
UBER is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.14x
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 195.9%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 122.9x)
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 122.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs BIRD's -69.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC -6.1% vs -147.7% |
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
UBER leads 1 • MRT leads 0 • BIRD leads 0 • LYFT leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 8037.2x MRT's $35M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $143M | $6.5B | $53.7B | $6.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$65M | -$63M | $7.0B | $313M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$76M | $2.9B | $8.5B | $59M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$42M | $1.2B | $9.8B | $679M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +37.1% | +43.2% | +41.0% | +41.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -101.9% | -51.0% | -2.5% | +11.7% | +0.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -151.1% | -53.4% | +43.8% | +15.9% | +0.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | -29.3% | +17.7% | +18.3% | +10.8% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.4% | -30.5% | +13.8% | +14.5% | +16.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +12.5% | — | -84.3% | +157.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BIRD and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.0x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 88% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 56.6x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $31M | $5.1B | $142.6B | $14.4B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $43M | $5.3B | $148.3B | $14.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.21x | -0.39x | 1.99x | 14.56x | -3580.25x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.11x | 20.75x | 122.88x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 23.50x | 56.63x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.73x | 0.20x | 0.81x | 2.74x | 2.37x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.83x | 1.73x | 5.20x | 22.77x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 4.61x | 14.61x | 22.20x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. LYFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -173.5% | +150.2% | +32.0% | +7.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -67.5% | +39.1% | +14.2% | +1.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.7% | -82.0% | -6.1% | +13.6% | -0.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -138.0% | -70.5% | -6.2% | +12.5% | -0.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.10x | 0.39x | 0.48x | 3.06x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $13M | $145M | $5.7B | $330M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $27M | $1.1B | $7.7B | $1.6B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $40M | $1.3B | $13.5B | $1.9B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.71x | -32.09x | -5.32x | 11.51x | 4.48x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -11.2% | -31.6% | -16.9% | -18.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.5% | -69.0% | -12.3% | -19.6% | -23.6% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | -85.6% | +29.6% | +64.9% | +13.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -99.4% | -76.8% | +35.6% | -42.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -99.4% | -82.7% | +65.6% | +195.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | -47.6% | +9.0% | +18.2% | +4.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.81x | 1.37x | 1.03x | 0.87x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.15 | $24.31 | $25.54 | $101.99 | $48.78 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.55 | $2.15 | $12.46 | $67.19 | $20.46 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.0% | +15.1% | +53.0% | +67.5% | +59.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 42.2 | 48.2 | 40.7 | 72.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 7.4M | 13.7M | 15.9M | 12.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.20 | — | $17.58 | $101.95 | $35.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 59 | 61 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +9.7% | +4.6% | +5.8% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UBER leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
MRT vs BIRD vs LYFT vs UBER vs DKNG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately 193% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
Lyft, Inc.
(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 108. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MRT, BIRD, LYFT, UBER, DKNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MRT or BIRD or LYFT or UBER or DKNG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRT and BIRD and LYFT and UBER and DKNG and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and BIRD (Technology) and LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while MRT, BIRD, LYFT, UBER, DKNG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.