Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PGC logo
PGC
NBTB logo
NBTB
CNOB logo
CNOB
FULT logo
FULT
FIS logo
FIS
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$819M
5Y Perf.+146.9%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.65B
5Y Perf.+103.3%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PGC logoPGC
NBTB logoNBTB
CNOB logoCNOB
FULT logoFULT
FIS logoFIS
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$819M$2.52B$1.65B$4.50B$20.26B$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$441M$902M$676M$1.89B$11.66B$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$169M$80M$392M$2.67B$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin58.1%73.6%49.9%67.4%37.6%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin11.9%24.3%16.7%25.7%17.9%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E12.5x11.5x10.0x11.5x6.2x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$260M$327M$1.17B$1.30B$4.01B$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$185M$92M$271M$599M$10.27B$343.34B

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PGC
NBTB
CNOB
FULT
FIS
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC)100246.9+146.9%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB)100203.3+103.3%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (7-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PGC and CNOB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

PGC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +64.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CNOB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
Best for: bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
  • Beta 0.61 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs PGC's 8.5%
  • 13.1% ROA vs PGC's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs PGC's 155.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCNOB logoCNOB13.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs PGC's 8.5%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.61 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)PGC logoPGC+64.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs PGC's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.6%

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PGCPeapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
76.6%$217M
Wealth Management Division
23.4%$66M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CNOBConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGFULT

Who Leads Where

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories

KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • PGC leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • CNOB leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • 3 tied

Explore the data ↓
FULTFulton Financial Corp…
0leads
CNOBConnectOne Bancorp, I…
0leads
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
0leads
PGCPeapack-Gladstone Fin…
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
1leads
FISFidelity National Inf…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 635.2x PGC's $441M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGC's 8.5%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$441M$902M$676M$1.9B$11.7B$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$241M$122M$529M$4.1B$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$169M$80M$392M$2.7B$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$225M$102M$267M$2.8B$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+73.6%+49.9%+67.4%+37.6%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+24.3%+16.7%+25.7%+17.9%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.5%+18.8%+11.9%+20.7%+22.9%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+24.9%+15.1%+14.1%+23.9%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%+39.5%+53.1%+47.2%+30.6%+18.2%+16.0%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$819M$2.5B$1.6B$4.5B$20.3B$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$2.7B$2.7B$5.5B$23.7B$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.92x14.47x22.14x11.23x52.27x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.49x11.54x10.04x11.49x6.24x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x2.06x0.80x2.14x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.92x11.03x24.17x10.43x6.50x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x2.90x2.72x2.38x1.90x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x1.29x1.05x1.23x1.46x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.66x11.49x16.31x15.81x7.21x67.15x8.88x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+9.5%+5.5%+11.6%+18.4%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.1%+0.6%+1.2%+7.5%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+7.9%+3.5%+7.5%+6.0%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+2.4%+1.5%+9.5%+6.6%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98746675
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.17x0.74x0.37x0.29x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$251M$142M$1.1B$1.0B$3.4B$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$185M$92M$271M$599M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$260M$327M$1.2B$1.3B$4.0B$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.32x1.05x0.39x0.84x21.16x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+66.8%+17.6%+26.9%+21.0%-38.9%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.7%+18.3%+45.1%+37.8%-49.4%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%+48.5%+114.8%+96.0%-18.9%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.6%+44.4%+32.8%+61.1%-67.3%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.7%+108.5%+139.7%+114.2%-25.6%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%+14.1%+29.0%+25.1%-6.8%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x0.76x1.02x0.99x0.61x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.57$48.27$32.87$23.48$82.74$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.42$39.20$21.79$16.60$37.91$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.8%+99.7%+99.5%+47.4%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.263.169.968.130.860.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded116K266K328K1.7M5.6M12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PGC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", FULT as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs PGC's 0.43%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$46.00$34.00$23.50$62.88$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts7101120374861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+3.0%+1.9%+3.3%+4.2%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0137515615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$1.43$0.63$0.77$1.63$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+0.4%+0.1%+1.5%+7.0%+0.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.

2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately -610% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).

09

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PGC and NBTB and CNOB and FULT and FIS and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (PGC (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. NBTB, CNOB, FULT, FIS, KO, JPM pay a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.