Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $383M | $272M | $207M | $184M | $444M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $120M | $90M | $135M | $208M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $25M | $14M | $16M | $35M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 70.3% | 54.7% | 54.3% | 51.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 27.2% | 7.0% | 14.1% | 23.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 9.7x | 11.8x | 11.0x | 10.3x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $115M | $52M | $70M | $180M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $132M | $119M | $26M | $225M | $10.27B |
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +67.1% vs KO's +17.2%
FUNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 361.3% 10Y total return vs PKBK's 286.6%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage
Among these 6 stocks, MNSB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.32
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
- 13.1% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0% |
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PKBK leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • FUNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PKBK leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $120M | $90M | $135M | $208M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $35M | $9M | $23M | $53M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $25M | $14M | $16M | $35M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $16M | $11M | $11M | -$5M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +70.3% | +54.7% | +54.3% | +51.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +27.2% | +7.0% | +14.1% | +23.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +20.5% | +16.0% | +11.5% | +16.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +13.1% | +12.4% | +7.9% | -2.4% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +120.9% | +2.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 63% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $272M | $207M | $184M | $444M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $255M | $140M | $227M | $398M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 11.11x | 14.70x | 14.16x | 12.50x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 9.66x | 11.79x | 11.03x | 10.27x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | 0.85x | 2.90x | — | 0.29x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 7.85x | 15.69x | 11.90x | 7.58x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.28x | 2.29x | 1.35x | 2.14x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.34x | 1.11x | 0.87x | 1.44x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 17.67x | 19.90x | 17.26x | 16.98x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +12.6% | +7.8% | +7.3% | +12.2% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +7.1% | +2.0% | +5.0% | +8.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +9.8% | +0.6% | +6.0% | +4.4% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.56x | 0.28x | 0.32x | 0.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$17M | -$67M | $43M | -$45M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $132M | $119M | $26M | $225M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $115M | $52M | $70M | $180M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 0.99x | 0.16x | 0.31x | 0.49x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +14.3% | +24.3% | +26.5% | +24.4% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +44.4% | +52.1% | +37.2% | +57.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +192.2% | +153.7% | +13.1% | +132.8% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +141.9% | +69.0% | +18.1% | +111.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +361.3% | +149.0% | +135.4% | +198.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +43.0% | +36.4% | +4.2% | +32.5% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PKBK currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.67x | 0.50x | 0.60x | 0.65x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $42.35 | $22.62 | $25.17 | $56.48 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $17.86 | $33.85 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +98.9% | +94.9% | +99.0% | +98.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 71.6 | 51.2 | 65.3 | 63.3 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 13K | 41K | 45K | 44K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", BWFG as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs BWFG's 1.44%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | — | — | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $0.92 | $0.37 | $0.40 | $0.80 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +2.4% | +0.3% | +0.2% |
PKBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PKBK vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs BWFG vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus First United Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning FUNC is approximately -433% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 526. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 4% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is PKBK or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or BWFG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BWFG: +198. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and FUNC and CZWI and MNSB and BWFG and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PKBK (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PKBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.