Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $70M | $37.74B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.29B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-113M | $577M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $1.28B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $1.66B | $343.34B |
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pliant Therapeutics… (PLRX) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 191.0 | +91.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLRX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.60
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 2.76x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 37.7x)
- 20.4% margin vs PLRX's -1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs PLRX's -1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PLRX's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs PLRX's -23.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs PLRX's -45.1%, ROIC 33.4% vs -49.2% |
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and PLRX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALNY's 13.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$118M | $677M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$113M | $577M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $641M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +80.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +96.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.2% | +4.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $37.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54M | $37.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | 121.39x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.74x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 67.05x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.16x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 48.27x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.09x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-59 for PLRX. PLRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs PLRX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.1% | +98.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.1% | +11.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.2% | +33.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.4% | +15.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.62x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$379M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $1.7B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $1.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -29.83x | 2.02x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $343 for PLRX. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs PLRX's -23.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PLRX's -63.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | -29.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.1% | -7.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | +46.5% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +69.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | +366.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.2% | +13.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALNY and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLRX's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.60x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.95 | $495.55 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $281.76 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.9% | +57.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 44.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 481K | 1.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALNY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $445.67 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ALNY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PLRX vs ALNY vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLRX or ALNY or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -96. 6% for Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. (PLRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PLRX's -94. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning PLRX is approximately 88% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. (PLRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Pliant Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for PLRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLRX or ALNY or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 57. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLRX or ALNY or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PLRX, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLRX or ALNY or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PLRX: -94. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLRX and ALNY and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLRX (Healthcare) and ALNY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while PLRX, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.