Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
QTTB logo
QTTB
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARDX logo
ARDX
PRAX logo
PRAX
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.-93.4%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.-22.9%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+344.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+227.1%

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTTB logoQTTB
IMVT logoIMVT
ARDX logoARDX
PRAX logoPRAX
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$161M$6.90B$1.40B$7.70B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$54M$0.00$428M$0.00$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$-506M$-58M$-327M$57.05B
Gross Margin99.5%91.9%60.0%
Operating Margin39.8%-8.7%25.9%
Forward P/E5.2x14.4x
Total Debt$15M$72K$212M$110K$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$48M$902M$68M$357M$343.34B

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTTB
IMVT
ARDX
PRAX
JPM
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)1006.6-93.4%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10077.1-22.9%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100444.5+344.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100327.1+227.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QTTB leads in 6 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇QTTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.
The Income Pick

QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.50
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 4.85x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 4.85x
  • 156.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
Best for: growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQTTB logoQTTB156.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueQTTB logoQTTBLower P/E (5.2x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsQTTB logoQTTB61.9% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
Stability / SafetyQTTB logoQTTBBeta 0.50 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)QTTB logoQTTB+6.4% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)QTTB logoQTTB53.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QTTBQ32 Bio Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQTTBLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARDX's -13.6%.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$54M$0$428M$0$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M-$532M-$35M-$357M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M-$506M-$58M-$327M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$407M-$37M-$283M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+91.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.8%-8.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+61.9%-13.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-51.0%-8.8%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.0%-14.1%+11.8%+2.7%+16.0%
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QTTB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 67% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$161M$6.9B$1.4B$7.7B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129M$6.0B$1.5B$7.3B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.22x-12.14x-21.88x-19.77x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.43x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.01x3.43x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.70x7.19x8.21x6.83x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
QTTB leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%-68.2%-38.1%-43.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+53.3%-62.2%-11.8%-40.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.7%-65.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.8%-68.3%-10.6%-49.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942335
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.00x1.27x0.00x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M-$902M$144M-$357M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$902M$68M$357M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$72,000$212M$110,000$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.88x-0.28x0.74x
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — QTTB and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $950 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, QTTB leads with a +643.5% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs QTTB's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+267.4%+29.8%-7.5%-6.9%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+643.5%+110.9%+53.0%+491.9%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.3%+55.0%+42.6%+1757.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%+213.0%+207.6%-14.2%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+237.9%+162.2%-36.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.4%+15.7%+12.6%+164.8%+33.6%
Evenly matched — QTTB and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — QTTB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

QTTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ARDX's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x1.66x1.01x1.55x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.85$36.27$8.40$366.52$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$14.32$3.49$37.19$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.1%+92.7%+67.7%+72.7%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.257.945.031.959.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded827K1.9M3.4M396K7.0M
Evenly matched — QTTB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 198.8% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$43.67$17.00$607.15$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts823161661
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallQ32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTTB vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -90. 5% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 231% more volatile than QTTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q32 Bio Inc. grew EPS 136. 8% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QTTB leads at 31. 5% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 198.

8% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. QTTB, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is QTTB or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QTTB and IMVT and ARDX and PRAX and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (QTTB (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARDX (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while QTTB, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.