Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $57M | $2.57T | $2.90T | $1.76B | $4.35T | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $742.78B | $318.27B | $713M | $422.57B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $90.80B | $125.22B | $-159M | $160.21B | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 50.6% | 68.3% | 22.6% | 60.4% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | 11.5% | 46.8% | -18.3% | 32.7% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 27.1x | 23.3x | — | 25.3x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $807K | $152.99B | $112.18B | $30M | $59.29B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $86.81B | $30.24B | $281M | $30.71B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 133.6 | +33.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 220.1 | +120.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 114.0 | +14.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.16 vs KO's 2.26
- +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6%
In this particular matchup, AMZN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
MSFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs GENI's -22.3%
- Beta 0.84 vs ROLR's 2.73
GENI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6%
GOOGL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.3%
- 27.4% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -16.6%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.0% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs GENI's -22.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ROLR's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs GENI's -34.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs GENI's -15.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -16.6% |
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • MSFT leads 1 • GENI leads 1 • ROLR leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • JPM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 43569.7x ROLR's $17M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -22.3%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +30.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $742.8B | $318.3B | $713M | $422.6B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $155.9B | $192.6B | -$54M | $161.3B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $90.8B | $125.2B | -$159M | $160.2B | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B | $72.9B | $16M | $73.3B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +50.6% | +68.3% | +22.6% | +60.4% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | +11.5% | +46.8% | -18.3% | +32.7% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +12.2% | +39.3% | -22.3% | +37.9% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -0.3% | +22.9% | +2.2% | +17.3% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +16.6% | +18.3% | +30.5% | +21.8% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | +74.8% | +23.4% | -6.0% | +81.9% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GENI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 52% valuation discount to GOOGL's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ROLR offers better value at 0.16x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $2.57T | $2.90T | $1.8B | $4.35T | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $2.63T | $2.98T | $1.5B | $4.38T | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | 33.27x | 28.65x | -15.57x | 33.27x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.13x | 23.25x | — | 25.29x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | 1.19x | 1.52x | — | 1.12x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.06x | 18.35x | — | 29.14x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 3.58x | 10.30x | 2.63x | 10.80x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 6.28x | 8.49x | 2.41x | 10.59x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 333.39x | 40.53x | 27.33x | 59.39x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-22 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +23.3% | +33.1% | -22.2% | +39.0% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +11.5% | +19.2% | -15.4% | +27.4% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +14.7% | +24.9% | -16.6% | +25.1% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +15.3% | +29.7% | -15.3% | +30.3% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.37x | 0.33x | 0.04x | 0.14x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $66.2B | $81.9B | -$250M | $28.6B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $86.8B | $30.2B | $281M | $30.7B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $153.0B | $112.2B | $30M | $59.3B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | 39.96x | 55.65x | -75.96x | 392.15x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $29,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,776 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs GENI's -34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 43.0% vs GENI's 4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | +5.3% | -17.0% | -36.5% | +14.3% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +11.9% | -17.7% | -34.6% | +105.2% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +88.5% | +20.7% | +13.4% | +192.4% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +41.0% | +56.0% | -62.2% | +195.3% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +567.1% | +727.4% | -31.5% | +888.1% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +23.5% | +6.5% | +4.3% | +43.0% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 1.43x | 0.84x | 1.59x | 1.30x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $278.56 | $555.45 | $13.73 | $408.61 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $197.28 | $356.28 | $3.83 | $162.00 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +85.6% | +70.3% | +49.9% | +88.0% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 36.8 | 36.8 | 73.2 | 40.8 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 42.9M | 33.7M | 5.4M | 26.9M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", GENI as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.3% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs GOOGL's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $307.77 | $551.96 | $9.40 | $411.80 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 | 82 | 19 | 83 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +0.2% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 21 | 1 | 2 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.23 | — | $0.82 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
ROLR vs AMZN vs MSFT vs GENI vs GOOGL vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Alphabet Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +195. 3%, compared to -62. 2% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +888. 1% versus GENI's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately -1462% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -63. 0% for Genius Sports Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 41. 3% to $551. 96.
08Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ROLR, AMZN, GENI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ROLR or AMZN or MSFT or GENI or GOOGL or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ROLR and AMZN and MSFT and GENI and GOOGL and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ROLR (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology) and GENI (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. MSFT, KO, JPM pay a dividend while ROLR, AMZN, GENI, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.