Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SBFG logo
SBFG
ICE logo
ICE
CME logo
CME
CZWI logo
CZWI
FIS logo
FIS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+47.3%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%
CME
CME Group Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97.79B
5Y Perf.+65.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SBFG logoSBFG
ICE logoICE
CME logoCME
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$147M$79.60B$97.79B$207M$20.26B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$91M$12.64B$6.76B$90M$11.66B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$14M$3.30B$4.24B$14M$2.67B$13.70B
Gross Margin70.6%61.9%86.3%54.7%37.6%61.7%
Operating Margin19.0%38.7%65.6%7.0%17.9%29.3%
Forward P/E9.4x17.3x22.0x11.8x6.2x25.3x
Total Debt$74M$20.28B$3.76B$52M$4.01B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$72M$837M$4.42B$119M$599M$10.27B

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SBFG
ICE
CME
CZWI
FIS
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SB Financial Group,… (SBFG)100147.3+47.3%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%
CME Group Inc. (CME)100165.8+65.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 2 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. SB Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. ICE, CME, CZWI, and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SBFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 27.3%
  • NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64
Best for: stability
CME
CME Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

CME is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 262.4% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • 62.8% margin vs SBFG's 15.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs SBFG's 2.94
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
Best for: efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSBFG logoSBFG11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsCME logoCME62.8% margin vs SBFG's 15.4%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
SBFGSB Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2013
All Segments
111.3%$1M
Data Processing
80.8%$836,000
Operating Segments
28.5%$295,000
All Other Segments
2.0%$21,000
Intersegment Elimination
-122.6%$-1,269,000
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
CMECME Group Inc.
FY 2025
clearing and transaction fees
81.0%$5.3B
MarketData
12.3%$803M
OtherRevenue
6.7%$436M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSBFGLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBFG's 15.4%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$91M$12.6B$6.8B$90M$11.7B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$19M$6.5B$4.7B$9M$4.1B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$3.3B$4.2B$14M$2.7B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$4.3B$4.4B$11M$2.8B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+61.9%+86.3%+54.7%+37.6%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+38.7%+65.6%+7.0%+17.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.4%+26.1%+62.8%+16.0%+22.9%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.7%+33.9%+64.4%+12.4%+23.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.5%+23.1%+21.4%+63.0%+30.6%+18.2%
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CME offers better value at 1.76x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$147M$79.6B$97.8B$207M$20.3B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$150M$99.0B$97.1B$140M$23.7B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.64x24.36x24.15x14.70x52.27x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.44x17.34x21.98x11.79x6.24x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.32x2.74x1.76x2.90x2.14x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.69x15.34x21.56x15.69x6.50x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.61x6.30x15.00x2.29x1.90x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x2.77x3.38x1.11x1.46x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.85x18.56x23.32x19.90x7.21x67.15x
SBFG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CME's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+11.6%+15.3%+7.8%+18.4%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+2.3%+2.2%+0.8%+7.5%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+7.5%+10.2%+2.0%+6.0%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+9.5%+3.6%+0.6%+6.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9795667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.70x0.13x0.28x0.29x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$19.4B-$666M-$67M$3.4B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$837M$4.4B$119M$599M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$20.3B$3.8B$52M$4.0B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x6.53x41.55x0.16x21.16x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%-11.8%+3.2%+24.3%-38.9%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+30.3%-20.4%+3.6%+52.1%-49.4%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.0%+34.6%+67.9%+153.7%-18.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.8%+30.9%+46.2%+69.0%-67.3%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.5%+195.3%+262.4%+149.0%-25.6%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.6%+10.4%+18.9%+36.4%-6.8%+13.7%
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBFG's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.35x-0.28x0.50x0.61x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.93$189.35$329.16$22.62$82.74$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.10$136.67$244.56$12.83$37.91$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.4%+74.2%+81.9%+94.9%+47.4%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.231.940.151.230.860.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K3.2M2.6M41K5.6M12.7M
Evenly matched — CME and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", CME as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricSBFG logoSBFGSB Financial Grou…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …CME logoCMECME Group Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$194.00$320.80$62.88$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts363623748
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.4%+4.1%+1.7%+4.2%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1213156156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$1.93$10.92$0.37$1.63$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%+1.7%+0.3%+3.0%+7.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CME leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SBFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI vs FIS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +262. 4% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning SBFG is approximately -329% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SB Financial Group, Inc.

(SBFG) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SB Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI or FIS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SBFG and ICE and CME and CZWI and FIS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (SBFG (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and CME (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.