Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $777M | $1.69B | $730M | $2.88B | $4.83B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $968M | $310M | $644M | $826M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $59M | $69M | $209M | $254M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 48.6% | 69.1% | 79.7% | 71.8% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 8.3% | 26.2% | 43.7% | 37.5% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.3x | 10.0x | 14.7x | 16.5x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $396M | $117M | $991M | $22M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $560M | $52M | $108M | $1.08B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
- +41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5%
HOPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.72 vs HOPE's 0.97
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 32.5% margin vs HOPE's 6.0%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs HOPE's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs SMBK's 198.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs HOPE's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs HOPE's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs HOPE's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.3% |
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SMBK leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $968M | $310M | $644M | $826M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $84M | $89M | $294M | $320M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $59M | $69M | $209M | $254M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $147M | $70M | $217M | $283M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +48.6% | +69.1% | +79.7% | +71.8% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +8.3% | +26.2% | +43.7% | +37.5% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +6.0% | +22.1% | +32.5% | +30.7% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +15.2% | +22.6% | +33.7% | +34.3% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +35.0% | +2.3% | +11.1% | -7.7% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $1.7B | $730M | $2.9B | $4.8B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $1.5B | $795M | $3.8B | $3.8B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 28.67x | 10.85x | 13.97x | 19.01x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.33x | 9.99x | 14.74x | 16.54x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | — | 2.06x | 4.40x | 4.22x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 18.21x | 9.78x | 13.37x | 11.79x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 1.74x | 2.32x | 4.48x | 5.85x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.26x | 2.52x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 11.14x | 10.41x | 13.26x | 15.72x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +2.6% | +14.2% | +9.3% | +14.2% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.3% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +1.7% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +2.3% | +10.2% | +6.8% | +12.4% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +9.3% | +16.6% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.43x | 0.01x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | -$164M | $65M | $883M | -$1.1B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $560M | $52M | $108M | $1.1B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $396M | $117M | $991M | $22M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.17x | 0.91x | 2.12x | 1.54x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +22.7% | +12.0% | +14.8% | +13.5% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +31.7% | +16.4% | +16.3% | -5.5% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +66.1% | +110.4% | +64.4% | +24.3% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +7.0% | +80.9% | +15.2% | -25.9% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +19.5% | +194.4% | +66.9% | +136.4% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +18.4% | +28.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOPE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.97x | 0.72x | 0.81x | 0.78x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $13.19 | $39.16 | $21.48 | $38.74 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $9.44 | $29.63 | $17.95 | $28.11 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +100.0% | +90.6% | +98.8% | +86.9% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 64.6 | 61.2 | 60.1 | 61.3 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 803K | 135K | 1.6M | 683K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $14.50 | $38.00 | $24.75 | $39.25 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 15 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +4.2% | +2.9% | +3.8% | +2.2% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 15 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.55 | $1.03 | $0.82 | $0.74 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +2.8% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SMBK vs HOPE vs IBCP vs CVBF vs FFIN vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus HOPE's +19. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HOPE is approximately -583% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or HOPE or IBCP or CVBF or FFIN or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, HOPE: +19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and HOPE and IBCP and CVBF and FFIN and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMBK (Financial Services) and HOPE (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.