Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $141M | $205M | $2.44B | $448M | $19.75B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $90M | $902M | $208M | $11.66B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $14M | $169M | $35M | $2.67B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 54.7% | 73.6% | 51.6% | 37.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 7.0% | 24.3% | 23.3% | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 53.8x | 11.7x | 11.2x | 10.4x | 6.1x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $52M | $327M | $180M | $4.01B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $119M | $185M | $225M | $599M | $343.34B |
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SR Bancorp, Inc. Co… (SRBK) | 100 | 217.3 | +117.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 222.3 | +122.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 224.3 | +124.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.4%, EPS growth 138.4%
- 30.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs JPM's 2.2%
BWFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.31
- +63.9% vs FIS's -50.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 4.3%
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 14.6x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.83
- 22.9% margin vs SRBK's 8.4%
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 202.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 14.6x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs SRBK's 8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.9% vs FIS's -50.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs SRBK's 0.4%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.1% |
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SRBK leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5496.3x SRBK's $51M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SRBK's 8.4%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $90M | $902M | $208M | $11.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $9M | $241M | $53M | $4.1B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $14M | $169M | $35M | $2.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $11M | $225M | -$5M | $2.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +54.7% | +73.6% | +51.6% | +37.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +7.0% | +24.3% | +23.3% | +17.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +16.0% | +18.8% | +16.9% | +22.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +12.4% | +24.9% | -2.4% | +23.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +63.0% | +39.5% | +2.1% | +30.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 75% valuation discount to FIS's 50.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.30x vs CZWI's 2.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $141M | $205M | $2.4B | $448M | $19.7B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $138M | $2.6B | $403M | $23.2B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.87x | 14.62x | 14.02x | 12.62x | 50.95x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.85x | 11.73x | 11.18x | 10.37x | 6.09x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.88x | 1.99x | 0.30x | 2.09x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.74x | 15.56x | 10.70x | 7.66x | 6.36x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.82x | 2.28x | 2.81x | 2.16x | 1.85x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.10x | 1.25x | 1.46x | 1.43x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.31x | 19.79x | 11.13x | 17.15x | 7.03x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $2 for SRBK. SRBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +12.2% | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +7.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +8.0% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +4.4% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.60x | 0.29x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$67M | $142M | -$45M | $3.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $119M | $185M | $225M | $599M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $52M | $327M | $180M | $4.0B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.49x | 21.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,259 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +63.9% total return vs FIS's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.7% vs FIS's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +23.6% | +14.0% | +25.6% | -40.4% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.0% | +62.6% | +20.5% | +63.9% | -50.4% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +149.8% | +49.9% | +137.4% | -21.0% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +64.1% | +46.9% | +120.3% | -67.4% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.6% | +121.2% | +103.1% | +202.4% | -26.7% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +35.7% | +14.5% | +33.4% | -7.6% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRBK and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.41x | 0.73x | 0.62x | 0.58x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $22.62 | $48.81 | $56.70 | $82.74 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.81 | $12.83 | $39.20 | $34.53 | $37.85 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +94.3% | +95.6% | +99.1% | +46.2% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 56.8 | 51.0 | 58.6 | 35.2 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 48K | 277K | 48K | 5.7M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", BWFG as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -1.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs SRBK's 0.28%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | — | $62.88 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 10 | 3 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +1.7% | +3.1% | +1.4% | +4.3% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.37 | $1.43 | $0.80 | $1.63 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +3.0% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +7.2% | +3.8% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
SRBK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is the stronger pick with 30. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -67. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus FIS's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately 156% more volatile than SRBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock (SRBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SR Bancorp, Inc.
Common stock (SRBK) is pulling ahead at 30. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock — 47. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 64. 6% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 3% for SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock (SRBK).
09Is SRBK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 1. 7% yield, +121. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +121. 2%, SRBK: +105. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRBK and CZWI and NBTB and BWFG and FIS and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SRBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SRBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, NBTB, BWFG, FIS, JPM pay a dividend while SRBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.