Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Banks - Diversified
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $884M | $198M | $19.79B | $22.90B | $149.09B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $45M | $2.23B | $2.86B | $63.31B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-425M | $-79M | $-3.19B | $-1.13B | $7.49B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 91.2% | -13.9% | 77.7% | 69.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -21.1% | -196.7% | -153.3% | -45.9% | 23.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 8.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $80M | $25M | $1.92B | $267M | $67.42B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $231M | $2.60B | $7.67B | $1.14B | $343.34B |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenas BioPharma, In… (ZBIO) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
| Arcturus Therapeuti… (ARCT) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| BioNTech SE (BNTX) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 90.6 | -9.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 152.1 | +52.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4%
Among these 6 stocks, ARCT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MRNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +82.5% vs ARCT's -44.9%
BNTX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.54x
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.6%
- Beta 0.38, yield 6.6%, current ratio 1.16x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.38 vs ARCT's 2.46
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BNTX's 5.5%
- 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs ARCT's 2.46 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.5% vs ARCT's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs ZBIO's -97.4%, ROIC 7.5% vs -154.5% |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • ZBIO leads 0 • ARCT leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • BNTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and ZBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBIO's -37.8%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $45M | $2.2B | $2.9B | $63.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$423M | -$86M | -$3.2B | -$931M | $21.0B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$425M | -$79M | -$3.2B | -$1.1B | $7.5B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$210M | -$59M | -$1.6B | $277M | $9.5B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +91.2% | -13.9% | +77.7% | +69.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.1% | -196.7% | -153.3% | -45.9% | +23.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.8% | -173.5% | -143.6% | -39.6% | +11.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -129.9% | -71.1% | +9.7% | +15.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -97.9% | +2.6% | -24.5% | +5.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.5% | -82.7% | -34.9% | -2.1% | -9.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 17% valuation discount to PFE's 19.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $884M | $198M | $19.8B | $22.9B | $149.1B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $853M | -$8M | $19.1B | $14.3B | $215.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | -2.90x | -6.87x | -17.36x | 19.27x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 8.85x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 10.59x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 88.39x | 2.95x | 10.18x | 7.18x | 2.38x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.66x | 0.89x | 2.24x | 0.98x | 1.72x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 73.38x | 16.43x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-168 for ZBIO. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs ARCT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -167.7% | -36.6% | -36.7% | -6.0% | +8.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -28.4% | -26.6% | -5.3% | +3.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -154.5% | -2.8% | -26.1% | -4.3% | +7.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.7% | -29.2% | -27.6% | -3.1% | +9.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.12x | 0.22x | 0.01x | 0.78x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$206M | -$679M | -$7.4B | $66.3B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $231M | $2.6B | $7.7B | $1.1B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $25M | $1.9B | $267M | $67.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -62.50x | — | -1803.00x | -62.15x | 4.02x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,941 for ARCT. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +82.5% total return vs ARCT's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ARCT's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.6% | +11.5% | +61.7% | -6.4% | +7.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.9% | -44.9% | +82.5% | -13.7% | +12.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -74.6% | -59.6% | -17.5% | -21.6% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -80.6% | -75.9% | -58.0% | -13.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -79.4% | +168.3% | +550.6% | +25.8% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | -36.6% | -26.1% | -6.2% | -7.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCT's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ARCT's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.46x | 1.82x | 1.01x | 0.38x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.60 | $24.17 | $59.55 | $124.00 | $28.75 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $5.85 | $22.28 | $79.52 | $23.11 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +28.8% | +83.8% | +73.0% | +91.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 39.8 | 53.1 | 46.0 | 53.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 522K | 398K | 6.2M | 887K | 28.5M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZBIO as "Buy", ARCT as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", BNTX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.8% upside for ARCT (target: $23) vs -19.3% for MRNA (target: $40). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.56% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $22.50 | $40.29 | $132.33 | $26.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 27 | 24 | 39 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +6.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.72 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
PFE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs PFE vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -80. 6% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +550. 6% versus ARCT's -79. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. 's 2. 46β — meaning ARCT is approximately 553% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moderna, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -124. 5% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFE leads at -14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -37. 8% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 1% for ZBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCT: 222. 8% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
6% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ZBIO, ARCT, MRNA, BNTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or PFE or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 6. 6% yield). Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +25. 8%, ARCT: -79. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZBIO and ARCT and MRNA and BNTX and PFE and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBIO (Healthcare) and ARCT (Healthcare) and MRNA (Healthcare) and BNTX (Healthcare) and PFE (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. PFE, JPM pay a dividend while ZBIO, ARCT, MRNA, BNTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.