Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -44.7x · EV/EBITDA 5.1x · ROE -11.3%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.5B | $2.6B | $624M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.2B | $2.3B | $527M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -44.67 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.91 | 1.98 | 0.85 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.59 | 5.22 | 1.50 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 31.05 | 32.18 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.95 | 5.13 | 5.70 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.75 | 0.72 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.11 | 5.32 | 2.89 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 6.12 | 9.36 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.40 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 38.0% | 30.2% | 16.3% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 27.4% | 18.2% | 6.5% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3.9% | -3.9% | -15.8% | -31.8% | -1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -11.3% | -11.3% | -29.1% | -85.0% | -6.7% |
| ROA | -3.0% | -3.0% | -10.2% | -25.9% | -1.1% |
| ROIC | 106.6% | 106.6% | 31.1% | 14.4% | 85.3% |
| ROCE | 37.0% | 37.0% | 17.3% | 7.6% | 32.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.48 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.70 | 1.17 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.61 | -0.23 | -0.14 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.71 | -0.71 | -0.53 | -0.62 | 0.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.78 | — | — | 1.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 22.34 | 22.34 | -0.77 | -5.75 | 3.41 |
Net cash position: cash ($480M) exceeds total debt ($170M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 1.17 | 0.68 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 1.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.89 | 5.89 | 3.09 | 6.23 | 7.69 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.36 | 17.82 | 13.43 | 20.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 3.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $115M | $90M | $84M | $84M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AAUC stock.
Allied Gold Corporation's current P/E ratio is -44.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Allied Gold Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 5.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 4.1x.
Allied Gold Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -11.3%. The historical average is -33.0%.
Based on historical data, Allied Gold Corporation is trading at a P/E of -44.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Allied Gold Corporation has 38.0% gross margin and 27.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Allied Gold Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Mali regulatory and tax risk
Margin Divergence Signals Non-Operating Drags
Gross margin expanded to 46.0% in Q2 2026 from 26.1% a year earlier, per financial statements, yet net margin remained negative at -3.9% over the trailing twelve months, indicating non-operating charges are suppressing bottom-line profitability.
The widening gap between operating margin (40.2% in Q2 2026) and net margin (10.2% in the same quarter) suggests significant below-the-line items, likely including depreciation, interest, or one-time merger-related costs. While gross margin improvement reflects favorable gold prices and operational scaling, the persistent net losses across most quarters imply that reported earnings understate the cash-generating potential of the assets. Investors should monitor whether these drags normalize as the Kurmuk project ramps up and merger integration completes.
ROIC Volatility Masks Underlying Value Creation
ROIC swung from 4.9% in Q1 2024 to 42.3% in Q4 2025, per quarterly data, but averaged around 15% over the period, indicating that returns on invested capital are highly sensitive to gold prices and production timing rather than stable compounding.
The extreme quarterly swings in ROIC—ranging from 4.9% to 42.3%—reflect the lumpy nature of mining operations and the impact of capital-intensive expansion. The negative ROE of -11.3% in the latest quarter, despite positive ROIC, suggests that leverage and non-operating items are distorting equity returns. This divergence implies that ROIC is a more reliable measure of economic value creation than ROE for this company, as it isolates operating performance from financing decisions.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens as Operations Scale
The cash conversion cycle extended to 32 days in Q2 2026 from 10 days in Q1 2024, per quarterly data, driven by a sharp increase in days inventory outstanding to 81 days, indicating that rapid growth is absorbing cash into inventory.
The elongation of the CCC, primarily due to higher DIO, suggests that the company is building inventory to support expanded production, but this is consuming liquidity. DSO has also risen to 24 days, though still modest, while DPO remains stable around 73 days, indicating limited supplier leverage. The negative free cash flow margin of -61.8% in Q2 2026 underscores that working capital and capex are outpacing cash generation, a trend that warrants monitoring as the company matures.
Low Leverage Provides Cushion for Expansion
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.31 in Q2 2026 from 0.27 a year earlier, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 53.5x, indicating that debt service remains comfortable despite increased borrowing for growth.
The modest increase in leverage is well within manageable levels, and the strong interest coverage ratio suggests that the company can easily service its debt obligations. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 1.18x is low, indicating that EBITDA comfortably covers debt. The company's ability to fund the Kurmuk project with minimal debt and a strong cash position (though cash declined to $192.2M in Q2 2026) suggests a conservative capital structure that provides flexibility, but investors should monitor whether further debt is taken on to fund ongoing capex.
Liquidity Tightens as Cash Buffer Shrinks
The current ratio fell to 0.60 in Q2 2026 from 0.93 in Q4 2024, per quarterly data, while cash dropped from $479.8M to $192.2M, indicating that aggressive expansion has eroded the liquidity cushion.
The sub-1.0 current ratio suggests that current liabilities exceed current assets, which could strain the company's ability to meet short-term obligations if gold prices weaken or operations face disruptions. The quick ratio of 0.39 further highlights the reliance on inventory, which may be less liquid in a downturn. While the company's access to debt and strong interest coverage provide some comfort, the declining cash position and negative free cash flow warrant close monitoring, especially given the capital-intensive nature of the Kurmuk build-out.
P/E Misleads for Growth-Stage Miner
The trailing P/E of -50.87 is meaningless for a company with negative earnings, per current valuation data, while the forward P/E of 6.60 suggests the market is pricing in a dramatic earnings recovery that may not materialize if cost pressures persist.
For a company in a growth phase with significant non-cash charges and one-time items, the P/E ratio is not a reliable valuation metric. The negative trailing P/E reflects the net loss, but the forward P/E implies that analysts expect a sharp turnaround, which may be overly optimistic given the historical volatility in margins. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 5.92x appears reasonable relative to peers, but the forward EV/EBITDA of 15.82x suggests that the market is pricing in substantial EBITDA growth. Investors should focus on cash flow-based metrics like P/FCF, which at 35.36x indicates that the market is paying a premium for future cash generation, but this could be justified if the Kurmuk project delivers as planned.